The efficacy of hepatitis B vaccine alone or in combination with immunoglobulin in neonates born to HBsAG positive mothers was investigated. Twenty-four infants were given three doses (at 0, 1, 2 months) of the vaccine alone, while 27 infants were given hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and three doses of the vaccine. Fifty-eight infants born to HBsAg positive mothers who did not agree for vaccination or could not come for follow-up constituted the control group. The overall seroprotection rates (anti-HBS levels > or = 10 IU/l) were almost similar in both the groups at 6 months (81 and 76 per cent, respectively). However, the seroprotection rates in babies born to HBeAg positive mothers were better with combination of HBIG and vaccine (71 v. 57 per cent, respectively). It was also observed that seroprotection rates in babies born to anti-HBe positive mothers were even better (100 and 90 per cent in vaccine alone and combination group, respectively). No chronic carrier was detected in babies born to anti-HBe positive mothers.
Background Antibody‐based tests are available for measuring SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific immune responses but fast T‐cell assays remain scarce. Robust T cell‐based tests are needed to differentiate specific cellular immune responses after infection from those after vaccination. Methods One hundred seventeen individuals (COVID‐19 convalescent patients: n = 40; SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccinees: n = 41; healthy controls: n = 36) were evaluated for SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific cellular immune responses (proliferation, Th1, Th2, Th17, and inflammatory cytokines, activation‐induced marker [AIM] expression) by incubating purified peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) or whole blood (WB) with SARS‐CoV‐2 peptides (S, N, or M), vaccine antigens (tetanus toxoid, tick borne encephalitis virus) or polyclonal stimuli ( Staphylococcal enterotoxin, phytohemagglutinin). Results N‐peptide mix stimulation of WB identified the combination of IL‐2 and IL‐13 secretion as superior to IFN‐γ secretion to discriminate between COVID‐19‐convalescent patients and healthy controls ( p < .0001). Comparable results were obtained with M‐ or S‐peptides, the latter almost comparably recalled IL‐2, IFN‐γ, and IL‐13 responses in WB of vaccinees. Analysis 10 months as opposed to 10 weeks after COVID‐19, but not allergic disease status, positively correlated with IL‐13 recall responses. WB cytokine responses correlated with cytokine and proliferation responses of PBMC. Antigen‐induced neo‐expression of the C‐type lectin CD69 on CD4 + ( p < .0001) and CD8 + ( p = .0002) T cells informed best about the SARS‐CoV‐2 exposure status with additional benefit coming from CD25 upregulation. Conclusion Along with N‐ and S‐peptide‐induced IL‐2 and CD69 neo‐expression, we suggest to include the type 2 cytokine IL‐13 as T‐cellular recall marker for SARS‐CoV‐2 specific T‐cellular immune responses after infection and vaccination.
Background: Prophylactic vaccination against infectious diseases may induce a state of long-term protection in the otherwise healthy host. However, the situation is less predictable in immunocompromised patients and may require adjustment of vaccination schedules and/or basic therapy. Methods: A patient in full remission of multiple myeloma since the last three years and on long-term maintenance therapy with pomalidomide, a drug inhibiting angiogenesis and myeloma cell growth, was vaccinated twice with Comirnaty followed by two vaccinations with Vaxzevria. Seroconversion and SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular responses were monitored. Results: No signs of seroconversion or T cellular memory were observed after the first “full immunization” with Comirnaty. Consequently, long-term-maintenance therapy with Pomalidomide was stopped and two additional shots of Vaxzevria were administered after which the patient seroconverted with Spike(S)-protein specific antibody levels reaching 49 BAU/mL, mild S-peptide pool-specific T cell proliferation, effector cytokine production (IL-2, IL-13), and T cellular activation with increased numbers of CD3+CD4+CD25+ T cells as compared to vaccinated and non-vaccinated control subjects. However, despite suspension of immunosuppression and administration of in total four consecutive heterologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccine shots, the patient did not develop neutralizing RBD-specific antibodies. Conclusions: Despite immunomonitoring-based adjustment of vaccination and/or therapy schedules vaccination success, with clear correlates of protection, the development of RBD-specific antibodies could not be achieved in the immunocompromised patient with current SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Thus, our report emphasizes the need for improved active and passive immunization strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infections.
The Kv1.3 channel has become a therapeutic target for the treatment of various diseases. Several Kv1.3 channel blockers have been characterized from scorpion venom; however, extensive studies require amounts of toxin that cannot be readily obtained directly from venoms. The Pichia pastoris expression system provides a cost-effective approach to overcoming the limitations of chemical synthesis and E. coli recombinant expression. In this work, we developed an efficient system for the production of three potent Kv1.3 channel blockers from different scorpion venoms: Vm24, AnTx, and Ts6. Using the Pichia system, these toxins could be obtained in sufficient quantities (Vm24 1.6 mg/L, AnTx 46 mg/L, and Ts6 7.5 mg/L) to characterize their biological activity. A comparison was made between the activity of tagged and untagged recombinant peptides. Tagged Vm24 and untagged AnTx are nearly equivalent to native toxins in blocking Kv1.3 (Kd = 4.4 pM and Kd = 0.72 nM, respectively), whereas untagged Ts6 exhibits a 53-fold increase in Kd (Kd = 29.1 nM) as compared to the native peptide. The approach described here provides a method that can be optimized for toxin production to develop more selective and effective Kv1.3 blockers with therapeutic potential.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.