One hundred newborn infants were studied prospectively for 1 year for evidence of infection with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). The indirect membrane fluorescence technique was used to determine specific antibody in sera. Infection was shown in 29 cases. In 31 infants exposed to an RSV epidemic season, there was no evidence of infection. Maternal antenatal sera were also tested, and wide range of IgG antibody to RSV was found. Mean titre of maternal IgG antibody to RSV was significantly higher (P less than 0.001) in those mothers whose babies remained uninfected than in those whose babies had proved RSV infection before 6 months of age. Babies born to mothers with high levels of IgG antibody to respiratory syncytial virus were protected against infection with this virus during the first months of life when the risk of severe disease was greatest.
The time course of change in FEV1, bronchial reactivity, and daily measures of asthma control (peak expiratory flow, symptoms, and beta 2-agonist inhaler use) was determined during 6 wk of treatment with inhaled budesonide, 800 micrograms twice a day, and for 2 wk following cessation of treatment in 40 asthmatic subjects in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. Histamine reactivity, expressed as the provocative dose of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20), was measured at intervals during the 8 wk of the study, with more frequent measurements after the first and last dose of drug to provide a detailed profile of change at the start and end of treatment. The first dose of budesonide caused a small increase in median values of FEV1 (0.2 L) and PD20 (1.0 doubling dose of histamine), which was maximum at 6 h. There was a further increase in FEV1 and PD20 over the 6 wk in the budesonide group relative to placebo, the maximum increases (0.53 L, 3.4 doubling doses of histamine) being recorded 6 h after the last dose on Day 42. Following cessation of treatment, FEV1 and PD20 declined and PD20 returned to placebo values at 1 wk. Median PEF increased by 40 and 30 L/min in the morning and evening, respectively, with budesonide treatment. Symptom scores and beta 2-agonist inhaler use were lower in the budesonide group than the placebo group during treatment but tended to be similar (symptom scores) or higher (beta 2-agonist) in the 2 wk following cessation of treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Background It has been suggested that inhaled corticosteroids may provide greater protection against constrictor stimuli that act indirectly such as exercise than those that act directly such as histamine. Methods The effects of six weeks treatment with inhaled budesonide (800 ug twice daily) on bronchial reactivity to histamine, exercise, and eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation of dry air were compared in a double blind, placebo controlled, non-crossover study in 40 subjects with asthma. Change in bronchial reactivity to histamine and eucapnic hyperventilation over the six weeks was measured as change in the provocative dose of histamine or dry air causing a 20% fall in FEV, (PD20 histamine and PV20 eucapnic hyperventilation (EVH) of dry air); this was not possible for exercise because of the development of refractoriness. To enable the change in response to all three stimuli to be compared, the response (percent fall in FEV,) to a fixed dose was measured for all three challenge tests. Results After budesonide there was an increase in PD20 histamine from 0-48 to 2-81 pmol and in PV20 EVH from 364 to 639 litres, and a significant correlation between the changes in PD20 histamine and PV20 EVH (r = 0-63). The median percentage fall in FEV, in response to eucapnic hyperventilation, exercise, and histamine was similar before budesonide (25-5%, 26-6%, and 24-5%); the reduction in the percentage fall in FEV, with budesonide was also similar for the three challenges (18-9%, 17-5%, and 16-6%), and all differed significantly from the changes following placebo. There was a significant correlation between change in percentage fall in FEV, after budesonide with the three stimuli (histamine v exercise: r = 0-48; histamine v eucapnic hyperventilation: r = 0-46; exercise v eucapnic hyperventilation: r = 0-63). Conclusion The similar magnitude of change in bronchial reactivity to all three stimuli after budesonide and the within subject correlation obtained between these changes suggest that corticosteroids act by a common mechanism to protect against eucapnic hyperventilation, exercise, and histamine.Patients with asthma show increased airway reactivity to a wide range of stimuli, some of which appear to act directly on airway smooth muscle and some indirectly through mast cell mediator release or sensory nerve stimulation. Drugs such as beta2 agonists reduce bronchial reactivity irrespective of the stimulus, whereas others, such as sodium cromoglycate and inhaled frusemide, reduce the airway response to challenges that act indirectly, such as exercise,' 2metabisulphite,3'4 and cold air hyperventilation,5 with little or no effect on directly acting stimuli such as histamine and methacholine.67Corticosteroids when given regularly have been shown to inhibit the response to most bronchoconstrictor stimuli,"'9 but whether they give similar protection against different forms of challenges is not clear. It has been suggested that they may have a greater effect on exercise induced bronchoconstriction than that induced by hist...
Higher doses of inhaled albuterol have been shown to cause slightly more bronchodilatation than standard doses from a metered-dose inhaler in patients with severe chronic airflow limitation. Higher doses, however, carry an increased risk of side effects, and the optimum dose balancing benefit and adverse effects have yet to be established. We have therefore looked at objective and subjective evidence of beneficial and adverse effects after 4 doses of albuterol in 30 patients with chronic bronchitis, severe airflow limitation, and less than 200 ml increase in FEV1 after 200 micrograms inhaled albuterol. Subjects were given placebo, 400 micrograms, 1 mg, 2 mg, and 4 mg albuterol by dry powder inhaler in random order on separate days in a double-blind study, and FEV1, relaxed VC, PEFR, 12-min walk distance, finger tremor, oxygen saturation, heart rate, and arrhythmias were measured at intervals over 6 h. With increasing doses of albuterol, there was a significant dose-related increase in FEV1, VC, and PEFR, the maximal mean changes being 196 ml, 480 ml, and 50 L/min, respectively. The duration of effect was longer with the higher doses. There was a dose-related increase in heart rate, tremor amplitude, and supraventricular ectopic beats and a dose-related fall in oxygen saturation. There was no drug-related effect on the frequency of ventricular ectopic beats either at rest or during the walk tests. The largest increases in walk distance occurred after the 1 and 2 mg doses and the least after the 4 mg dose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Measurement of bronchial reactivity is widely used in epidemiological surveys. Histamine has been compared with methacholine inhalation challenge in two samples of adults from a small town to determine which is the better agent for use in community studies. Increasing doses of histamine and methacholine were given, up to a maximum of4 and 12 umol respectively, according to the method of Yan et al, the provocative dose of agonist causing a 20% fall in FEV, (PD20) being measured. More subjects had a measurable PD20 with methacholine than with histamine, both in a random sample of 108 subjects (25 v 11 subjects, p < 0 01) and in an additional 95 subjects selected because of wheeze in the last 12 months (67 v 48 subjects, p < 0-01). Side effects were mild with both agents but histamine caused voice change in more subjects (21% v 1 1%). Repeatability was assessed in a further group of subjects with wheeze in the last year. The 95% range for a single estimation of PD20 in subjects with a measured PD20 on at least one occasion was ± 2 5 doubling doses for histamine (n = 25) and ± 2-1 doubling doses for methacholine (n = 33). Thus methacholine has advantages over histamine for community studies ofbronchial reactivity as it is possible to use doses that produce more PD20 measurements with fewer side effects.
Systemic corticosteroids are almost universally used in the treatment of severe acute asthma but the optimum length of treatment with corticosteroids following recovery from an acute attack of asthma is not established. Thirty-five patients admitted with acute asthma and treated with oral prednisolone 40 mg daily in addition to bronchodilator therapy until full recovery, with stable peak expiratory flow recordings (PEF) within 15% of their previous best PEF or predicted PEF were studied. They were all discharged home on regular inhaled corticosteroids and regular or as required use of bronchodilators and randomized to receive either prednisolone 40 mg daily or placebo for the first 14 days. Median PEF values increased from 31% predicted on admission to hospital to 71% predicted on discharge from hospital in the active treatment group (19 patients) and from 32-73% in the placebo group (16 patients). There was no difference between the two groups in the median values of the forced expiratory volume in one second, forced vital capacity, total lung capacity or diurnal variation in PEF either at the time of discharge from hospital or at 14 and 28 days after discharge from hospital. This study suggests that there is no need to reduce prednisolone gradually following recovery from an exacerbation of asthma, provided systemic corticosteroid treatment is continued until a satisfactory and stable PEF is achieved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.