Cerebral ischaemia appears to be an important mechanism of secondary neuronal injury in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and is an important predictor of outcome. To date, the thresholds of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral oxygen utilization (CMRO(2)) for irreversible tissue damage used in TBI studies have been adopted from experimental and clinical ischaemic stroke studies. Identification of irreversibly damaged tissue in the acute phase following TBI could have considerable therapeutic and prognostic implications. However, it is questionable whether stroke thresholds are applicable to TBI. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine physiological thresholds for the development of irreversible tissue damage in contusional and pericontusional regions in TBI, and to determine the ability of such thresholds to accurately differentiate irreversibly damaged tissue. This study involved 14 patients with structural abnormalities on late-stage MRI, all of whom had been studied with (15)O PET within 72 h of TBI. Lesion regions of interest (ROI) and non-lesion ROIs were constructed on late-stage MRIs and applied to co-registered PET maps of CBF, CMRO(2) and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF). From the entire population of voxels in non-lesion ROIs, we determined thresholds for the development of irreversible tissue damage as the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for CBF, CMRO(2) and OEF. To test the ability of a physiological variable to differentiate lesion and non-lesion tissue, we constructed probability curves, demonstrating the ability of a physiological variable to predict lesion and non-lesion outcomes. The lower limits of the 95% confidence interval for CBF, CMRO(2) and OEF in non-lesion tissue were 15.0 ml/100 ml/min, 36.7 mumol/100 ml/min and 25.9% respectively. Voxels below these values were significantly more frequent in lesion tissue (all P < 0.005, Mann-Whitney U-test). However, a significant proportion of lesion voxels had values above these thresholds, so that definition of the full extent of irreversible tissue damage would not be possible based upon single physiological thresholds. We conclude that, in TBI, the threshold of CBF below which irreversible tissue damage consistently occurs differs from the classical CBF threshold for stroke (where similar methodology is used to define such thresholds). The CMRO(2) threshold is comparable to that reported in the stroke literature. At a voxel-based level, however (and in common with ischaemic stroke), the extent of irreversible tissue damage cannot be accurately predicted by early abnormalities of any single physiological variable.
We defined lesion and structurally normal regions using magnetic resonance imaging at follow-up in patients recovering from head injury. Early metabolic characteristics in these regions of interest (ROIs) were compared with physiology in healthy volunteers. Fourteen patients with severe head injury had positron emission tomography within 72 h, and magnetic resonance imaging at 3 to 18 months after injury. Cerebral blood flow (CBF), oxygen utilization (CMRO(2)), and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) were all lower in lesion ROIs, compared with nonlesion and control ROIs (P<0.001); however, there was substantial overlap in physiology. Control ROIs showed close coupling among CBF, blood volume (CBV), and CMRO(2), whereas relationships within lesion and nonlesion ROIs were abnormal. The relationship between CBF and CMRO(2) generally remained coupled but the slope was reduced; that for CBF and OEF was variable; whereas that between CBF and CBV was highly variable. There was considerable heterogeneity between and within patients. Although irreversibly damaged tissue is characterized by marked derangements in physiology, a more detailed analysis shows acute changes in physiology and physiologic relationships within regions of the brain that appear structurally normal at follow-up. Such pathophysiological derangements may result in selective neuronal loss and impact on functional outcome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.