The major epidemiological investigations of hearing impairment, disability and handicap show that the elderly are the group most disabled by their hearing impairment. There is considerable debate concerning the most efficient way of reducing this inevitable burden of age-related hearing impairments in the next generation. Early fitting of 'targeted' individuals with hearing aids may help but there are a large number of methodological problems associated with conducting and evaluating such a programme of research (especially retrospectively). The logical prerequisite to early fitting as a means of reducing later disability is to ascertain the acceptability of and benefit given by intervention at this early stage. This study therefore set out to investigate the age/sex register provided by the primary physician (GP) as an appropriate base to identify candidates for early aid fitting among a sample of middle-aged patients (50-65 years) living in Roath, Cardiff. Of the 662 who replied to an initial contact letter (1050 were on the age/sex register), 21 already possessed hearing aids. After screening and examination 66 people were offered some form of management which was accepted by 43 during the course of the study. Aid use thereby increased from about 3% to over 9% in this middle-aged group. A 2 year follow-up indicated continued use of the aids, and benefit on a speech reception task was measured. The cost of detecting those who might benefit was calculated using a two-question 'paper and pencil' screen as the first step. A national programme for Wales would cost at least 188,000 pounds per annum at 1990 prices over an initial 5 year span if a criterion which aimed to find at least 45 dB HTL impairments over mid-frequencies was implemented. For a criterion of 35 dB the cost would be 378,000 pounds pa.
Using screening questionnaires we were able to detect individuals aged 50-65 years with hearing disability in a general practice population. Those who had better ear hearing levels of 30 dB or worse were invited to take place in a cross-over study comparing the acceptability of a monaural or binaural hearing-aid fitting. Fifty-five per cent ultimately opted for a binaural fitting and had greater hearing disability and worse mean hearing levels than those who opted for a monaural fitting. They made their choice for acoustical reasons, particularly on the basis of improved localization ability.
The objective of this study was to assess the ease of handling, comfort, and general effectiveness of three types of earmould in patients who, due to their age, could be expected to experience handling difficulties. The three mould types were, meatal tip, skeleton and skeleton with the 'top prong' removed. The results indicated that the skeleton with the top prong removed was the best in all contexts but one. It was easiest and quickest to fit and least likely to be badly fitted. Only in feedback control did it perform less well. It was concluded that it should be routinely used for elderly patients fitted with low gain hearing aids.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.