No abstract

Conclusion:There is an increased risk of venous thrombosis in patients with cancer. The risk is greatest in the first few months after diagnosis and in the presence of distal metastasis. Patients also with Factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210A mutations have even higher risk.Summary: This is a report of the Multiple Environmental and Genetic Assessment (MEGA) of Risk Factors for Venous Thrombosis Study. MEGA is a case controlled population based study evaluating risk of venous thrombosis with various risk factors. This report details risk of venous thrombosis with cancer and the joint effects of cancer and selected genetic mutations predisposing to venous thrombosis. Patients were identified at 6 anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands between March 1, 1999, and May 31, 2002. Patients included were those 18-70 years of age with a first time diagnosis of pulmonary embolism or lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. Control patients, (partners of the patients with venous thrombosis) were also utilized in the study. Both patients and controls received a questionnaire to evaluate acquired risk factors for venous thrombosis. Once anticoagulation therapy had been discontinued for three months, patients and controls were interviewed and blood taken for analysis of Factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210A mutations.In patients with malignancy, the overall risk of venous thrombosis was increased 7 times (odds ratio [OR], 6.7; 95% CI, 5.2-8.6). The highest risk was present in patients with hematologic malignancies (OR 28.0, 95% CI, 4.0-199.7). Risk was also substantially increased in patient with gastrointestinal cancers (OR 18.9; 95% CI, 4.6-77.8), and patients with pulmonary malignancies (OR 24.8; 95% CI, 3.4-181.1). Risk was highest in the first several months following malignancy diagnosis (adjusted OR 53.5; 95% CI, 8.6-334.3). In patients with cancer the presence of distal metastatic disease further increased the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to patients without metastatic disease (adjusted OR, 19.8; 95% CI, 2.6-149.1). The combination of cancer and Factor V Leiden mutation increased the risk of VTE 12 times compared to patients with Factor V Leiden mutation and no diagnosed malignancy. Results were similar for patients with and without cancer with respect to the prothrombin 20210A mutation.Comment: The data raises the question as to whether patients with cancer should be screened for Factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210A mutation and treated with prophylactic anticoagulation therapy if a mutation is present. Also the question arises whether prophylactic anticoagulation is indicated in patients with malignancies associated with an especially high risk for VTE. The cost effectiveness of such strategies and the ultimate ability of such strategies to prolong life or improve quality of life are clear in patients with cancer who are undergoing surgery or active chemotherapy (ACTA Haematol 2001;106:73-80). There is currently no data to suggest routine prophylaxis for VTE in all cancer patients would be...

Background and Purpose-Although prior studies have demonstrated that 25% to 35% of stroke patients have had a recent infection, the role of infection as a risk factor remains unclear. Our aim was to characterize the effect of infectious/inflammatory syndromes on stroke risk. Methods-Case-control and crossover analyses of 233 cases and 363 controls aged 21 to 89 years were performed. Cases were patients hospitalized with a first ischemic stroke at a Los Angeles, California, medical center. Controls were outpatients in the hypertension, diabetes, and general medical clinics. All subjects were administered a neurological examination, an infection/inflammation (I/I) examination, and an interview to elicit recent I/I history at baseline (within several days of stroke onset) and again approximately 2 months later. Three physicians classified subjects by the presence or absence of I/I within 1 month of the index dates, based on findings of the I/I examination, the interview report, and laboratory results. Results-Infections, either total or specific, were not found more frequently in cases than controls. However, patients with a recent respiratory tract infection suffered more often from large-vessel atherothromboembolic or cardioembolic stroke than did patients without infection (48% vs 24%, Pϭ0.07). The age-and sex-adjusted relative risk estimate for these subtypes was 1.75 (95% CI, 0.86 to 3.55).