No abstract

No abstract

The trial was registered in the Dutch trial register (ISRCTN10841210).

Hormonal and ultrasound markers of ovarian function in hormonal contraception users measured at the end of the hormone-free interval do not seem to represent subsequent natural early follicular phase values. However, these values can, in some cases (FSH, AMH and AFC), be used to predict early follicular phase values using calculated prediction equations, which need to be validated in future research.

Objective: To evaluate whether abdominal-pelvic radiotherapy for childhood cancer impairs uterine function and increases the risk of pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Design: Nested cohort study. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Childhood cancer survivors previously exposed to abdominal-pelvic radiotherapy (RT-exposed CCSs) as part of their treatment for childhood cancer. Intervention(s): Radiotherapy-exposed CCSs (n ¼ 55) were age-and parity-matched to nonirradiated CCSs (non-RT-exposed CCSs; n ¼ 110) and general population controls (n ¼ 110). Main Outcome Measures: Uterine volume, pregnancy complications, and pregnancy outcomes. Result(s): Among nulligravidous participants, median (interquartile range) uterine volume was 41.4 (18.6-52.8) mL for RT-exposed CCSs, 48.1 (35.7-61.8) mL for non-RT-exposed CCSs, and 61.3 (49.1-75.5) mL for general population controls. Radiotherapyexposed CCSs were at increased risk of a reduced uterine volume (<44.3 mL) compared with population controls (odds ratio [OR] 5.31 [95% confidence interval 1.98-14.23]). Surprisingly, the same was true for non-RT-exposed CCSs ). Among gravidous participants, RT-exposed CCSs had increased risks of pregnancy complications, preterm delivery, and a low birth weight infant compared with population controls ], respectively). Compared with non-RT-exposed CCSs, RT-exposed CCSs were at increased risk of delivering a low birth weight infant ).

Chance of resistance to CC is almost double in women with PCOS harbouring the Ser/Ser genotype.

NTR2922 http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC = 2922.

BackgroundWeb-based questionnaires have become increasingly popular in health research. However, reported response rates vary and response bias may be introduced.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate whether sending a mixed invitation (paper-based together with Web-based questionnaire) rather than a Web-only invitation (Web-based questionnaire only) results in higher response and participation rates for female childhood cancer survivors filling out a questionnaire on fertility issues. In addition, differences in type of response and characteristics of the responders and nonresponders were investigated. Moreover, factors influencing preferences for either the Web- or paper-based version of the questionnaire were examined.MethodsThis study is part of a nationwide study on reproductive function, ovarian reserve, and risk of premature menopause in female childhood cancer survivors. The Web-based version of the questionnaire was available for participants through the Internet by means of a personalized user name and password. Participants were randomly selected to receive either a mixed invitation (paper-based questionnaire together with log-in details for Web-based questionnaire, n = 137) or a Web-only invitation (log-in details only, n = 140). Furthermore, the latter group could request a paper-based version of the questionnaire by filling out a form.ResultsOverall response rates were comparable in both randomization groups (83% mixed invitation group vs 89% in Web-only invitation group, P = .20). In addition, participation rates appeared not to differ (66% or 90/137, mixed invitation group vs 59% or 83/140, Web-only invitation group, P =.27). However, in the mixed invitation group, significantly more respondents filled out the paper-based questionnaire compared with the Web-only invitation group (83% or 75/90 and 65% or 54/83, respectively, P = .01). The 44 women who filled out the Web-based version of the questionnaire had a higher educational level than the 129 women who filled out the paper-based version (P = .01). Furthermore, the probability of filling out the Web-based questionnaire appeared to be greater for women who were allocated to the Web-only invitation group (OR = 2.85, 95% CI 1.31 - 6.21), were older (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.15), had a higher educational level (OR high vs low = 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 - 0.52), or were students (OR employed vs student = 3.25, 95% CI 1.00 - 10.56).ConclusionsAlthough overall response as well as participation rates to both types of invitations were similar, adding a paper version of a questionnaire to a Web-only invitation resulted in more respondents filling out the paper-based version. In addition, women who were older, had a higher level of education, or were students, were more likely to have filled out the Web-based version of the questionnaire. Given the many advantages of Web-based over paper-based questionnaires, researchers should strongly consider using Web-based questionnaires, although possible response bias when using these types of questionnaires sho...