Grx3 and Grx4, two monothiol glutaredoxins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, regulate Aft1 nuclear localisation. We provide evidence of a negative regulation of Aft1 activity by Grx3 and Grx4. The Grx domain of both proteins played an important role in Aft1 translocation to the cytoplasm. This function was not, however, dependent on the availability of iron. Here we demonstrate that Grx3, Grx4 and Aft1 interact each other both in vivo and in vitro, which suggests the existence of a functional protein complex. Interestingly, each interaction occurred independently on the third member of the complex. The absence of both Grx3 and Grx4 induced a clear enrichment of G1 cells in asynchronous cultures, a slow growth phenotype, the accumulation of intracellular iron and a constitutive activation of the genes regulated by Aft1. The grx3grx4 double mutant was highly sensitive to the oxidising agents hydrogen peroxide and t-butylhydroperoxide but not to diamide. The phenotypes of the double mutant grx3grx4 characterised in this study were mainly mediated by the Aft1 function, suggesting that grx3grx4 could be a suitable cellular model for studying endogenous oxidative stress induced by deregulation of the iron homeostasis. However, our results also suggest that Grx3 and Grx4 might play additional roles in the oxidative stress response through proteins other than Aft1.
Background-Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading cause of community acquired pneumonia; however, only a small proportion of cases can be detected by conventional methods. The ability of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test performed on whole blood samples to identify patients with pneumococcal pneumonia was investigated. Methods-One hundred and fourteen consecutive adult patients with community acquired pneumonia were evaluated by a wide battery of diagnostic tests in order to determine the aetiology. Blood samples from these patients and 50 controls were also tested by the nested PCR test to detect selected pneumolysin gene fragments of S pneumoniae. Results-The patients were divided into four groups: (1) 40 patients with pneumococcal pneumonia in 22 of whom (55%) the PCR was positive (eight of 11 with bacteraemia and 14 of 29 without); (2) 30 with pneumonia due to other pathogens in all of whom the PCR was negative; (3) 44 with pneumonia of unknown aetiology in 14 of whom (32%) PCR was positive, and (4) 50 controls in whom the PCR test was positive in two (4%). Thus, the sensitivity of the test was 55% and the specificity 100% (81% if positive PCR tests among undiagnosed patients are considered as false positive results). Conclusion-PCR applied to whole blood samples appears to be a sensitive and very specific diagnostic test for identifying patients with pneumococcal pneumonia with a potential application in clinical practice. (Thorax 2000;55:133-137)
Although initial presentation has been commonly used to select empirical therapy in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), few studies have provided a quantitative estimation of its value. The objective of this study was to analyse whether a combination of basic clinical and laboratory information performed at bedside can accurately predict the aetiology of pneumonia. A prospective study was developed among patients admitted to the Emergency Department University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain, with CAP. Informed consent was obtained from patients in the study. At entry, basic clinical (age, comorbidity, symptoms and physical findings) and laboratory (white blood cell count) information commonly used by clinicians in the management of respiratory infections, was recorded. According to microbiological results, patients were assigned to the following categories: bacterial (Streptococcus pneumoniae and other pyogenic bacteria), virus-like (Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia spp and virus) and unknown pneumonia. A scoring system to identify the aetiology was derived from the odds ratio (OR) assigned to independent variables, adjusted by a logistic regression model. The accuracy of the prediction rule was tested by using receiver operating characteristic curves. One hundred and three consecutive patients were classified as having virus-like (48), bacterial (37) and unknown (18) pneumonia, respectively. Independent predictors related to bacterial pneumonia were an acute onset of symptoms (OR 31; 95% CI, 6-150), age greater than 65 or comorbidity (OR 6.9; 95% CI, 2-23), and leukocytosis or leukopenia (OR 2; 95% CI, 0.6-7). The sensitivity and specificity of the scoring system to identify patients with bacterial pneumonia were 89% and 94%, respectively. The prediction rule developed from these three variables classified the aetiology of pneumonia with a ROC curve area of 0.84. Proper use of basic clinical and laboratory information is useful to identify the aetiology of CAP. The prediction rule may help clinicians to choose initial antibiotic therapy.
Detection of pneumococcal antigen has been used to increase the rate of diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia. The present study was designed to determine the value of rapid detection of pneumococcal antigen in samples obtained by transthoracic needle aspiration (TNA) from patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in a comparative analysis with culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Pneumococcal antigen was detected by latex agglutination. One hundred and ten consecutive patients diagnosed with CAP underwent TNA. Patients were grouped, according to PCR, culture and serological results, into pneumococcal pneumonia (n = 18), other known aetiology (n = 67) and unknown aetiology (n = 25). In patients with pneumococcal pneumonia, antigen was detected in 17 (94.4%) cases. Antigen was detected in one and nine patients with pneumonia of other known or unknown aetiologies, respectively, yielding a specificity of 89.1%. In conclusion, detection of pneumococcal antigen on samples obtained by TNA from patients with CAP provides a sensitive and specific diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. Furthermore, its rapid results would reduce the dependence on empirical treatments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.