The cardiac Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) generates an inward electrical current during SR-Ca2+ release, thus possibly promoting afterdepolarizations of the action potential (AP). We used transgenic mice 12.5 weeks or younger with cardiomyocyte-directed overexpression of NCX (NCX-Tg) to study the proarrhythmic potential and mechanisms of enhanced NCX activity. NCX-Tg exhibited normal echocardiographic left ventricular function and heart/body weight ratio, while the QT interval was prolonged in surface ECG recordings. Langendorff-perfused NCX-Tg, but not wild-type (WT) hearts, developed ventricular tachycardia. APs and ionic currents were measured in isolated cardiomyocytes. Cell capacitance was unaltered between groups. APs were prolonged in NCX-Tg versus WT myocytes along with voltage-activated K+ currents (Kv) not being reduced but even increased in amplitude. During abrupt changes in pacing cycle length, early afterdepolarizations (EADs) were frequently recorded in NCX-Tg but not in WT myocytes. Next to EADs, delayed afterdepolarizations (DAD) triggering spontaneous APs (sAPs) occurred in NCX-Tg but not in WT myocytes. To test whether sAPs were associated with spontaneous Ca2+ release (sCR), Ca2+ transients were recorded. Despite the absence of sAPs in WT, sCR was observed in myocytes of both genotypes suggesting a facilitated translation of sCR into DADs in NCX-Tg. Moreover, sCR was more frequent in NCX-Tg as compared to WT. Myocardial protein levels of Ca2+-handling proteins were not different between groups except the ryanodine receptor (RyR), which was increased in NCX-Tg versus WT. We conclude that NCX overexpression is proarrhythmic in a non-failing environment even in the absence of reduced KV. The underlying mechanisms are: (1) occurrence of EADs due to delayed repolarization; (2) facilitated translation from sCR into DADs; (3) proneness to sCR possibly caused by altered Ca2+ handling and/or increased RyR expression.

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is an inherited arrhythmogenic disease that can cause sudden cardiac death due to ventricular fibrillation (VF). While pharmacological therapy with beta-blockers and/or Ca(2)(+) antagonists is often unreliable, a recent study has demonstrated that flecainide can effectively suppress arrhythmia in a murine model of CPVT as well as clinically in two human subjects suffering from CPVT. We here present the case of an 11-year-old boy suffering from CPVT-1 as well as a review of the current relevant literature. After resuscitation due to VF at age 9, an automated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was implanted in 2007. Under beta-blocker therapy, repeated shocks were delivered due to either fast ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VF. This persisted under additional therapy with verapamil. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator routine interrogations showed frequent non-sustained VT with an average of 8.8 per day. Additionally, the patient suffered from impaired physical performance due to decreased chronotropic competence. In July 2009, flecainide was added to the beta-blocker/verapamil regimen, resulting in a plasma level of 0.20 mg/L. No ICD shock or sustained VT occurred until December 2010. Genetic testing revealed an RyR2 receptor mutation. The case demonstrates the challenge of diagnosis and management of CPVT. It furthermore supports recent experimental evidence that the class 1 antiarrhythmic drug flecainide can suppress CPVT. The presented case supports a novel strategy in treating CPVT with the class I antiarrhythmic agent flecainide.

Cardiac calcium (Ca(2+)) handling subsumes the mechanisms maintaining the myocardial Ca(2+) homeostasis that contribute essentially to cardiac performance. This review addresses the interaction of transplasmalemmal and transsarcoplasmic Ca(2+) flux, its potential modifications due to β-adrenergic stimulation and its implications on cardiac action potential.

Class I antiarrhythmic drugs are sodium channel inhibitors that act by slowing myocardial conduction and, thus, interrupting or preventing reentrant arrhythmia. Due to proarrhythmic effects and the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia, class I antiarrhythmics should not be administered in patients with structural heart disease. Nevertheless, there remains a broad spectrum of arrhythmias--among the most common being atrial fibrillation--that can successfully be treated with class I antiarrhythmic drugs. This review gives an overview on the classification, antiarrhythmic mechanisms, indications, side effects, and application modes of class I antiarrhythmic drugs.