Background: Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is the most common cyanotic congenital heart disease, and sudden cardiac death represents an important mode of death in these patients. Data evaluating the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in this patient population remain scarce. Methods: Nationwide French Registry including all TOF patients with an ICD initiated in 2010 by the French Institute of Health and Medical Research. The primary time to event endpoint was the time from ICD implantation to first appropriate ICD therapy. Secondary outcomes included ICD-related complications, heart transplantation, and death. Clinical events were centrally adjudicated by a blinded committee. Results: A total of 165 patients (mean age 42.2±13.3 years, 70.1% males) were included from 40 centers, including 104 (63.0%) in secondary prevention. During a median (IQR) follow-up of 6.8 (2.5-11.4) years, 78 (47.3%) patients received at least one appropriate ICD therapy. The annual incidence of the primary outcome was 10.5% (7.1% and 12.5% in primary and secondary prevention, respectively, p=0.03). Overall, 71 (43.0%) patients presented with at least one ICD complication, including inappropriate shocks in 42 (25.5%) patients and lead dysfunction in 36 (21.8%) patients. Among 61 (37.0%) primary prevention patients, the annual rate of appropriate ICD therapies was 4.1%, 5.3%, 9.5%, and 13.3% in patients with respectively no, one, two, or ≥ three guideline-recommended risk factors. QRS fragmentation was the only independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapies (HR 3.47, 95% CI 1.19-10.11), and its integration in a model with current criteria increased the 5-year time-dependent area under the curve from 0.68 to 0.81 (p=0.006). Patients with congestive heart failure and/or reduced LVEF had a higher risk of non-arrhythmic death or heart transplantation (HR=11.01, 95% CI: 2.96-40.95). Conclusions: Patients with TOF and an ICD experience high rates of appropriate therapies, including those implanted in primary prevention. The considerable long-term burden of ICD-related complications, however, underlines the need for careful candidate selection. A combination of easy-to-use criteria including QRS fragmentation might improve risk stratification. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT03837574

Introduction: Either cryoenergy or radiofrequency can be used during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) ablation. There are still limited data comparing their respective long-term efficacy (>1 year). This study sought to compare the very long-term outcomes of AVNRT ablation using radiofrequency or cryotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively included all patients who had undergone a first AVNRT ablation in our institution between January 2010 and December 2017. The primary endpoint was recurrence of documented AVNRT. Results: The study population consisted of 409 patients (274 females; mean age, 49.9 years). Ablation was performed using cryoenergy in 260 patients and radiofrequency in 149. High acute procedural success rate (>98%) was obtained and no permanent AV block was observed using both techniques. During a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 2.3 years, documented AVNRT recurrence occurred in 24 (9.2%) and 4 patients (2.7%) in the cryoablation (CA) and radiofrequency (RF) group, respectively. The risk of AVNRT recurrence was significantly higher in the CA group as compared with the RF group (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-5.9). Most of the recurrences after CA occurred between 1-and 6-year follow-up (14/24; 58.3%), with one-third of late recurrences after 3-year follow-up. In multivariable analysis, only Koch's triangle anatomical variant was associated with AVNRT recurrence after CA (HR = 6.7; 95% CI, 2.7-16.3). Conclusion: While AVNRT recurrence rates were similar at 1 year of follow-up regardless of the energy used, long-term efficacy appeared higher after radiofrequency ablation. Strikingly, recurrences occured much later after cryotherapy compared with radiofrequency ablation.

In the post-TAVI period, our data support PPI in patients with CAVB even if paroxysmal. Our data also suggest PPI may be considered in patients with NOP-LBBB associated with either prolonged PR or HV interval.

No abstract