Hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains are no longer limited to acute-care hospitals but have now spread to other healthcare settings such as long-term-care facilities (LTCFs), in most of which they are endemic. In Europe, few studies have addressed the MRSA situation in LTCFs. A cross-sectional study to determine MRSA prevalence and factors associated with S. aureus carriage in community LTCF residents is reported here. Nasal and decubitus ulcer cultures were performed for residents of nine community LTCFs. Residents were classified as MRSA carriers, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus carriers and non-carriers. Overall, 1377 nasal swabs and 82 decubitus ulcer cultures were performed. MRSA was isolated from 15.5% and 59.0% of the former and latter, respectively. The prevalence of MRSA colonization was 16.8% (95% CI 14.9-18.8), varying from 6.7% to 35.8% (p <0.001) among LTCFs. Several independent variables were related to MRSA colonization. It is noteworthy that residents in an LTCF with fewer than 150 beds had at least a two-fold higher probability of being MRSA carriers. Modifiable factors were medical devices, decubitus ulcers and previous antibiotic treatment. An age of 85 years or older, a Charlson index >or=2 and transfer from an acute-care facility were non-modifiable factors also related to MRSA colonization. A high MRSA prevalence among residents in community LTCFs in Spain, with great variability among facilities, was found. The factors identified as being associated with MRSA colonization could be prevented by the implementation of several measures. Control strategies need to be coordinated between LTCFs and acute-care hospitals.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of prior pneumococcal vaccination on the clinical outcome of 554 consecutive hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia from 1995 to 2004, 61 of whom had been vaccinated in the 5 years before admission. Outcome variables that were compared in vaccinated and unvaccinated adults included the occurrence of bacteremia, the time to resolution of pneumonia symptoms, the length of hospital stay, and mortality. Prior pneumococcal vaccination was associated with a lower risk of bacteremia (odds ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.98). Compared with unvaccinated patients, vaccine recipients had better clinical outcomes, which included a faster resolution of pneumonia symptoms. The median length of hospital stay was shorter in vaccinated patients (8.0 vs. 9.0 days; p=0.032). Overall case-fatality rates did not differ significantly between groups (1.6% vs. 6.2%; p=0.233). In conclusion, prior pneumococcal vaccination appears to be associated with a lower risk of bacteremia, a faster time to resolution of symptoms, and a shorter hospital stay in adults with pneumococcal pneumonia. The findings presented here provide additional support to the current vaccine recommendations and should encourage healthcare providers to increase pneumococcal vaccine coverage among targeted adult populations.
The number of elderly patients in the community with immunosuppressive conditions has increased progressively over recent decades. We sought to determine the incidence, causative organisms and outcome of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) occurring in immunocompromised older patients. We prospectively compared cases of CAP in immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised patients admitted to five public hospitals in three Spanish regions. Of 320 cases studied, 115 (36%) occurred in immunocompromised patients, including: solid or hematological malignancy (97), corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs (44), solid organ or stem cell transplant (five), and other conditions (eight). The etiology was established in 44% of immunocompromised patients vs. 32% of non-immunocompromised patients (p 0.03). Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common causative organism in both groups (29% vs. 21%; p 0.08), followed by Legionella pneumophila (3% vs. 6%; p 0.01). Gram-negative bacilli were more frequent among immunocompromised patients (5% vs. 0.5%; p <0.01), particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3% vs. 0%; p 0.04). Nocardiosis was only observed in immunocompromised patients (two cases). Bacteremia occurred similarly in the two groups. No significant differences were found with respect to ICU admission (8%, in both groups) or the length of stay (12.5 vs. 10.4 days). The early (<48 h) (3.5 vs. 0.5%; p 0.04) and overall case-fatality rates (12% vs. 3%; p <0.01) were higher in immunocompromised patients. In conclusion, a substantial number of older patients hospitalized for CAP are immunocompromised. Although relatively uncommon, CAP due to gram-negative bacilli, including P. aeruginosa, is more frequent among these patients. CAP occurring in immunocompromised patients causes significant morbidity and mortality.
According to our data, carbapenem resistance was not associated with higher mortality in patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia. The slower initial mortality in the CRPA group might have implications in the design of the optimal antibiotic policy strategy.
Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has not been recognised previously as a cause of MRSA infections in Spain. Nineteen patients carrying Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-positive MRSA were identified in a Barcelona hospital, of whom 15 were immigrants, mostly from South America. Twelve developed skin and soft-tissue infections. The associated isolates carried the PVL gene and staphylococcal chromosomal cassette (SCC)mecIV. A dominant clone belonging to sequence type (ST)8 and related to the USA300 clone was identified by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. This clone is emerging in Spain, primarily among immigrants from South America, but dissemination to the native Spanish population could increase.
-Lactam/-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) were compared to carbapenems in two cohorts of hematological neutropenic patients with extended-spectrum--lactamase (ESBL) bloodstream infection (BSI): the empirical therapy cohort (174 patients) and the definitive therapy cohort (251 patients). The 30-day case fatality rates and other secondary outcomes were similar in the two therapy groups of the two cohorts and also in the propensity-matched cohorts. BLBLIs might be carbapenemsparing alternatives for the treatment of BSI due to ESBLs in these patients.
We aimed to assess the rate and predictive factors of bloodstream infection (BSI) due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa in neutropenic cancer patients. We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including oncohematological neutropenic patients with BSI due to P. aeruginosa conducted across 34 centers in 12 countries from January 2006 to May 2018. A mixed logistic regression model was used to estimate a model to predict the multidrug resistance of the causative pathogens. Of a total of 1,217 episodes of BSI due to P. aeruginosa, 309 episodes (25.4%) were caused by MDR strains. The rate of multidrug resistance increased significantly over the study period (P = 0.033). Predictors of MDR P. aeruginosa BSI were prior therapy with piperacillin-tazobactam (odds ratio [OR], 3.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.29 to 5.30), prior antipseudomonal carbapenem use (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.65 to 3.87), fluoroquinolone prophylaxis (OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.92 to 4.64), underlying hematological disease (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.26 to 3.44), and the presence of a urinary catheter (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.65 to 3.91), whereas older age (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97 to 0.99) was found to be protective. Our prediction model achieves good discrimination and calibration, thereby identifying neutropenic patients at higher risk of BSI due to MDR P. aeruginosa. The application of this model using a web-based calculator may be a simple strategy to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from the early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage against MDR strains according to the local susceptibility patterns, thus avoiding the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients at a low risk of resistance development.
We aimed to assess the characteristics, treatment, risk factors and outcome of patients with breakthrough candidaemia (BrC) in the era of broad-spectrum antifungal therapies. We carried out a multicentre study of hospitalized adults with candidaemia at six hospitals in three countries. BrC episodes were compared with the remaining episodes (non-BrC). Of 409 episodes of candidaemia, 37 (9%) were BrC. Among them, antifungal treatment was administered as prophylaxis in 26 severely immunosuppressed patients (70%) and as a fever-driven approach in 11 (30%). Candida albicans was significantly less common in patients with BrC (24% versus 46%, p 0.010) whereas Candida krusei was more frequent (16% versus 2.4%, p < 0.001). BrC was associated with infections caused by fluconazole non-susceptible isolates (50% versus 18%, p < 0.001). Candida albicans BrC was associated with previous fluconazole treatment whereas Candida parapsilosis candidaemia was mostly catheter-related and/or associated with previous echinocandin therapy. The empirical antifungal therapy was more often appropriate in the non-BrC group (57% versus 74%, p 0.055). No significant differences were found in outcomes (early and overall mortality: 11% versus 13% p 0.802 and 40% versus 40% p 0.954, respectively). Fluconazole non-susceptibility was independently associated with the risk of BrC (adjusted OR 5.57; 95% CI 1.45-21.37). In conclusion, BrC accounted for 9% of the episodes in our multicentre cohort. The Candida spp. isolated were different depending on the previous antifungal therapy: previous azole treatment was associated with fluconazole non-susceptible strains and previous echinocandin treatment was associated with BrC caused by C. parapsilosis. These results should be taken into account to improve the empirical treatment of BrC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.