The North American gravity database as well as databases from Canada, Mexico, and the United States are being revised to improve their coverage, versatility, and accuracy. An important part of this effort is revising procedures for calculating gravity anomalies, taking into account our enhanced computational power, improved terrain databases and datums, and increased interest in more accurately defining long-wavelength anomaly components. Users of the databases may note minor differences between previous and revised database values as a result of these procedures. Generally, the differences do not impact the interpretation of local anomalies but do improve regional anomaly studies. The most striking revision is the use of the internationally accepted terrestrial ellipsoid for the height datum of gravity stations rather than the conventionally used geoid or sea level. Principal facts of gravity observations and anomalies based on both revised and previous procedures together with germane metadata will be available on an interactive Web-based data system as well as from national agencies and data centers. The use of the revised procedures is encouraged for gravity data reduction because of the widespread use of the global positioning system in gravity fieldwork and the need for increased accuracy and precision of anomalies and consistency with North American and national databases. Anomalies based on the revised standards should be preceded by the adjective "ellipsoidal" to differentiate anomalies calculated using heights with respect to the ellipsoid from those based on conventional elevations referenced to the geoid.

Subsidence is a common cause of amplifi ed relative sea-level rise, fl ooding, and erosion in coastal environments. In particular, subsidence due to sediment consolidation can play a signifi cant role in relative sea-level rise in large deltas. We use a combination of InSAR (interferometric synthetic aperture radar), leveling, and global positioning system data to map absolute vertical land motion in the Fraser River delta, western Canada. We show that primary consolidation of shallow Holocene sediments is the main cause for the slow subsidence (−1 to −2 mm/a) affecting the delta lowlands. In addition, parts of the delta undergo increased anthropogenic subsidence. Rapid subsidence rates (−3 to −8 mm/a) are associated with recent artifi cial loads and exhibit a fi rst-order exponential decrease with a time constant of ~20 years, consistent with the theory of consolidation. Assuming two sea-level rise scenarios of 30 or 100 cm by the end of the twenty-fi rst century, natural subsidence will augment relative sea-level rise in the Fraser Holocene lowlands by ~50% or ~15%. Anthropogenic subsidence will augment relative sea-level rise by ~130% or ~40%, potentially raising it to as much as 1-2 m. In deltaic, lacustrine, and alluvial environments, anthropogenic sediment consolidation can result in signifi cant amplifi cation and strong spatial variations of relative sea-level rise that need to be considered in local planning.

By using monthly mean water levels at 55 sites around the Great Lakes, a regional model of vertical crustal motion was computed for the region. In comparison with previous similar studies over the Great Lakes, 15 additional gauge sites, data from all seasons instead of the 4 summer months, and 8 additional years of data were used. All monthly water levels available between 1860 and 2000, as published by the U.S. National Ocean Survey and the Canadian Hydrographic Service, were used. For each lake basin, the vertical velocities of the gauge sites relative to each other were simultaneously computed, using the least-squares adjustment technique. Our algorithm solves for and removes a monthly bias common to all sites, as well as site-specifi c biases. It also properly weighs the input water levels, resulting in a realistic estimation of the uncertainties in tilting parameters. The relative velocities obtained for each lake were then combined to obtain relative velocities over the entire Great Lakes region. Finally, the gradient of the relative rates for the regional model was found to agree best with the ICE-3G global isostatic model of Tushingham and Peltier, whereas the ICE-4G gradients were too small around the Great Lakes.