No abstract

No abstract

Background: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatinine (sCr) improves early after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation but subsequently declines. Although sCr is a commonly accepted clinical standard, cystatin C (CysC) has shown superiority in assessment of renal function in disease states characterized by muscle wasting. Among patients with an LVAD, we aimed to (1) longitudinally compare CysC-eGFR and sCr-eGFR, (2) assess their predictive value for early postoperative outcomes, and (3) investigate mechanisms which might explain potential discrepancies. Methods: A prospective cohort (n=116) with CysC and sCr concurrently measured at serial time points, and a retrospective cohort (n=91) with chest computed tomography performed within 40 days post-LVAD were studied. In the prospective cohort, the primary end point was a composite of in-hospital mortality, renal replacement therapy, or severe right ventricular failure. In the retrospective cohort, muscle mass was estimated using pectoralis muscle area indexed to body surface area (pectoralis muscle index). Results: In the prospective cohort, sCr-eGFR significantly improved early post-LVAD and subsequently declined, whereas CysC-eGFR remained stable. CysC-eGFR but not sCr-eGFR predicted the primary end point: odds ratio per 5 mL/(min·1.73 m 2 ) decrease 1.16 (1.02–1.31) versus 0.99 (0.94–1.05). In retrospective cohort, for every 5 days post-LVAD, a 6% decrease in pectoralis muscle index was observed (95% CI, 2%–9%, P =0.003). After adjusting for time on LVAD, for every 1 cm 2 /m 2 decrease in pectoralis muscle index, there was a 4% decrease in 30-day post-LVAD sCr (95% CI, 1%–6%, P =0.004). Conclusions: Initial improvement in sCr-eGFR is likely due to muscle wasting following LVAD surgery. CysC may improve assessment of renal function and prediction of early postoperative outcomes in patients with an LVAD.

Introduction Effective tacrolimus (TAC) dosing is hampered by complex pharmacokinetics and significant patient variability. The gut microbiome, a key mediator of endotoxemia, inflammation and oxidative stress in advanced heart failure (HF) patients, is a possible contributor to interindividual variations in drug efficacy. The effect of alterations in the gut microbiome on TAC dosing requirements after heart transplant (HT) has not been explored. Methods We enrolled 24 patients (mean age = 55.8 ±2.3 years) within 3 months post-HT. Biomarkers of endotoxemia ((lipopolysaccharide (LPS)), inflammation (tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)) and oxidative stress (8,12-iso-Isoprostane F-2alpha-VI) were measured in 16 blood samples. 22 stool samples were analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing. TAC dose and serum trough level were measured at the time of stool and blood collection. TAC doses were reported in mg/kg/day and as level-to-dose (L/D) ratio, and categorized as � vs. > median.

BACKGROUND: Elevated blood pressure (BP) has been linked to adverse events during left ventricular assist device support. In this study we investigated the association between outpatient BP and stroke or suspected pump thrombosis among HeartMate II (HMII) recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 220 HMII patients. Serial outpatient BP measurements were averaged. Patients were categorized by: (1) mean arterial pressure (MAP), high (>90 mm Hg) vs intermediate (80 mm Hg ≤ MAP ≤ 90 mm Hg) vs low (<80 mm Hg); (2) systolic BP (SBP), high (≥101 mm Hg, median) vs low; and (3) pulse pressure (PP), high (≥22 mm Hg, median) vs low. To assess visit-to-visit BP variability, patients were divided in quartiles of standard deviation of MAP and SBP. The primary end-point was the composite of stroke or suspected pump thrombosis. RESULTS: The risk for the primary end-point was increased in the high MAP group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49 to 5.05, vs intermediate MAP; and 6.73, 1.9 to 23.9, vs low MAP). MAP had higher predictive value for the primary end-point compared with SBP (p = 0.05). Patients with high SBP had a higher rate of stroke (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.09 to 7.17, vs low SBP). The combination of

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract