Synchrotron x-ray reflectivity is used to study the interface between bulk water and bulk n-alkanes with carbon numbers 6 through 10, 12, 16, and 22. For all interfaces, except the water-hexane interface, the interfacial width disagrees with the prediction from capillary-wave theory. The variation of interfacial width with carbon number can be described by combining the capillary-wave prediction for the width with a contribution from intrinsic structure. This intrinsic structure is determined by the gyration radius for the shorter alkanes and by the bulk correlation length for the longer alkanes.
The interface between bulk water and bulk hexane solutions of n-alkanols (H(CH(2))(m)OH, where m=20, 22, 24, or 30) is studied with x-ray reflectivity, x-ray off-specular diffuse scattering, and interfacial tension measurements. The alkanols adsorb to the interface to form a monolayer. The highest density, lowest temperature monolayers contain alkanol molecules with progressive disordering of the chain from the -CH(2)OH to the -CH(3) group. In the terminal half of the chain that includes the -CH(3) group the chain density is similar to that observed in bulk liquid alkanes just above their freezing temperature. The density in the alkanol headgroup region is 10% greater than either bulk water or the ordered headgroup region found in alkanol monolayers at the water-vapor interface. We conjecture that this higher density is a result of water penetration into the headgroup region of the disordered monolayer. A ratio of 1:3 water to alkanol molecules is consistent with our data. We also place an upper limit of one hexane to five or six alkanol molecules mixed into the alkyl chain region of the monolayer. In contrast, H(CH(2))(30)OH at the water-vapor interface forms a close-packed, ordered phase of nearly rigid rods. Interfacial tension measurements as a function of temperature reveal a phase transition at the water-hexane interface with a significant change in interfacial excess entropy. This transition is between a low temperature interface that is nearly fully covered with alkanols to a higher temperature interface with a much lower density of alkanols. The transition for the shorter alkanols appears to be first order whereas the transition for the longer alkanols appears to be weakly first order or second order. The x-ray data are consistent with the presence of monolayer domains at the interface and determine the domain coverage (fraction of interface covered by alkanol domains) as a function of temperature. This temperature dependence is consistent with a theoretical model for a second order phase transition that accounts for the domain stabilization as a balance between line tension and long range dipole forces. Several aspects of our measurements indicate that the presence of domains represents the appearance of a spatially inhomogeneous phase rather than the coexistence of two homogeneous phases.
X-ray surface scattering and interfacial tension measurements are used to study the solid-to-gas phase transition in soluble monolayers of F(CF 2 ) 8 (CH 2 ) 2 OH and F(CF 2 ) 10 (CH 2 ) 2 OH adsorbed at the water-hexane interface. X-ray reflectivity and diffuse scattering measurements determine the molecular ordering, the presence of domains, and the interfacial coverage of solid domains as a function of temperature. The temperature-dependent coverage can be analyzed by a functional form consistent with a critical transition proposed by theory.
Our view of molecular ordering in Langmuir monolayers at the water-vapor interface influences our understanding of molecular ordering at other interfaces, including liquid-liquid interfaces for which structural information is scarce. We present a comparative study of a monolayer of a long-chain alkanol at the watervapor and water-hexane interfaces using X-ray reflectivity to highlight significant differences between these two interfaces. The molecules in the Langmuir monolayer form an ordered phase of nearly rigid rods. In contrast, at the water-hexane interface, the triacontanol molecules form a condensed phase with progressive disordering of the chain from the -CH 2 OH to the -CH 3 group. Surprisingly, at the water-hexane interface, the density in the headgroup region is 10-15% greater than either bulk water or the ordered headgroup region found at the water-vapor interface. It is conjectured that this higher density is a result of water penetration into the headgroup region of the disordered monolayer.
Surfactants have their primary utility, both scientific and industrial, at the liquid-liquid interface. We review recent X-ray surface scattering experiments that probe the molecular ordering and phase behavior of surfactants at the water-oil interface. The presence of the oil modifies the interfacial ordering in a manner that cannot be understood simply from analogies with studies of Langmuir monolayers of surfactants at the water-vapor interface or from the traditional view that the solvent is fully mixed with the interfacial surfactants. These studies explored the role of chain flexibility and head group interactions on the ordering of long-chain alkanols and alkanoic acids. Small changes in the surfactant may produce large changes in the interfacial ordering. The interfacial monolayer can be spatially homogeneous or inhomogeneous. Investigators have observed interfacial phase transitions as a function of temperature between homogenous phases, as well as between homogeneous and inhomogeneous phases. Finally, varying the solvent chain length can alter the fundamental character of the phase transitions and lead to the formation of multilayer interfacial structures.
It has been proposed that annexin I has two separate interaction sites that are involved in membrane binding and aggregation, respectively. To better understand the mechanism of annexin I-mediated membrane aggregation, we investigated the properties of the inducible secondary interaction site implicated in membrane aggregation. X-ray specular reflectivity measurements showed that the thickness of annexin I layer bound to the phospholipid monolayer was 31 ( 2 Å, indicating that annexin I binds membranes as a protein monomer or monolayer. Surface plasmon resonance measurements of annexin I, V, and mutants, which allowed evaluation of membrane aggregation activity of annexin I separately from its membrane binding, revealed direct correlation between the relative membrane aggregation activity and the relative affinity of the secondary interaction site for the secondary membrane. The secondary binding was driven primarily by hydrophobic interactions, unlike calcium-mediated electrostatic primary membrane binding. Chemical cross-linking of membrane-bound annexin I showed that a significant degree of lateral association of annexin I molecules precedes its membrane aggregation. Taken together, these results support a hypothetical model of annexin I-mediated membrane aggregation, in which a laterally aggregated monolayer of membrane-bound annexin I directly interacts with a secondary membrane via its induced hydrophobic interaction site.
The interface between water and mixed surfactant solutions of CH(3)(CH(2))(19)OH and CF(3)(CF(2))(7)(CH(2))(2)OH in hexane was studied with interfacial tension and X-ray reflectivity measurements. Measurements of the tension as a function of temperature for a range of total bulk surfactant concentrations and for three different values of the molal ratio of fluorinated to total surfactant concentration (0.25, 0.28, and 0.5) determined that the interface can be in three different monolayer phases. The interfacial excess entropy determined for these phases suggests that two of the phases are condensed single surfactant monolayers of CH(3)(CH(2))(19)OH and CF(3)(CF(2))(7)(CH(2))(2)OH. By studying four different compositions as a function of temperature, X-ray reflectivity was used to determine the structure of these monolayers in all three phases at the liquid-liquid interface. The X-ray reflectivity measurements were analyzed with a layer model to determine the electron density and thickness of the headgroup and tailgroup layers. The reflectivity demonstrates that phases 1 and 2 correspond to an interface fully covered by only one of the surfactants (liquid monolayer of CH(3)(CH(2))(19)OH in phase 1 and a solid condensed monolayer of CF(3)(CF(2))(7)(CH(2))(2)OH in phase 2). This was determined by analysis of the electron density profile as well as by direct comparison to reflectivity studies of the liquid-liquid interface in systems containing only one of the surfactants (plus hexane and water). The liquid monolayer of CH(3)(CH(2))(19)OH undergoes a transition to the solid monolayer of CF(3)(CF(2))(7)(CH(2))(2)OH with increasing temperature. Phase 3 and the transition regions between phases 1 and 2 consist of a mixed monolayer at the interface that contains domains of the two surfactants. In phase 3 the interface also contains gaseous regions that occupy progressively more of the interface as the temperature is increased. The reflectivity determined the coverage of the surfactant domains at the interface. A simple model is presented that predicts the basic features of the domain coverage as a function of temperature for the mixed surfactant system from the behavior of the single surfactant systems.
Synchrotron X-ray reflectivity is used to study the electron density profile normal to the interface between bulk water and bulk n-docosane (C22H46). These measurements are interpreted in terms of an error function electron density profile to yield an interfacial width of 5.7 ± 0.2 Å. In contrast with an earlier measurement on the water−hexane interface, this interfacial width disagrees sharply with the prediction from capillary wave theory, σ cap = 3.5 Å. This width can be accounted for by combining the capillary wave prediction with a contribution from intrinsic structure due to the bulk correlation length of docosane. We also discuss the absence of interfacial freezing at this interface, a phenomenon observed for n-alkanes of a similar chain length at the alkane−vapor and alkane−silicon oxide interfaces.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.