The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of a chemical additive on the fermentation and aerobic stability of high-moisture corn (HMC). Ground HMC (~63% dry matter) was untreated, or treated with an additive containing sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and sodium nitrite as active ingredients, at 0, 2, 3, or 4 L/t of fresh matter. Laboratory silos (7.5 L) were prepared and ensiled for 21 and 90d (4 silos/treatment per d of ensiling). Small bag silos were prepared for untreated HMC and HMC treated with 4 L/t of the additive and analyzed for nitrate-N and nitrite-N after 0, 3, and 7d of ensiling. The concentration of nitrate-N was similar between these 2 treatments and was below levels considered problematic for ruminants. Nitrite-N was greater in HMC treated with the high level of additive but was also very low for both treatments. Numbers of yeasts were similar among treatments in fresh HMC and decreased substantially after ensiling. Numbers of yeasts were similar among treatments after 21d of ensiling but after 90d they were lower in treated versus untreated HMC. Concentrations of organic acids (lactic, acetic, and propionic) and pH were not different among treatments at any time of ensiling. In contrast, treatment with the additive markedly decreased the concentration of ethanol in HMC after 21 and 90d when compared with untreated HMC. Treatment with all levels of the additive markedly improved the aerobic stability and improved the recovery of dry matter compared with untreated HMC. Overall, our findings suggest that the chemical additive used in this study has the potential to improve the fermentation and aerobic stability of HMC after a relatively short period (21d) and after a moderate length (90d) of ensiling.
Evidence suggests that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) absorbed from the large intestine may contribute to the inflammatory response to high starch feeding in dairy cows. This work evaluated the impact of buffers or alkalinizing agents with expected large intestinal activity on faecal indicators of intestinal fermentation and LPS. Ten latelactation cows were used in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design with 7-day periods.Cows were fed a diet containing 265 g/kg dry matter of starch and were abomasally infused with 1 g/kg body weight cornstarch daily. Treatments were control (CON), ration supplementation with 200 g/day sodium bicarbonate (FSB), 200 g/day calcium carbonate (FCC) or 125 g/day calcium carbonate plus 75 g/day of magnesium oxide (FCCM), or abomasal infusion of a lipid encapsulate providing 200 g/day sodium bicarbonate (ISB). The FCC, FCCM and ISB treatments were hypothesized to have large intestinal buffering effects, and FSB was included as a secondary control. Milk, feed, rumen and faecal samples were collected on day 7 of each period. Treatment did not affect intake, milk yield or milk composition. There were no effects of treatment on ruminal measures except that ISB tended to reduce and the post-ruminal treatments as a whole (FCC, FCCM and ISB) reduced rumen butyrate compared with CON.Faecal pH was greater for FCCM compared with all other treatments. Total faecal VFA tended to increase with FCC and FCCM compared with CON and was increased by the post-ruminal treatments as a whole compared with CON. Treatment did not affect faecal dry matter, lactate or LPS or apparent total tract nutrient digestibility.Although some treatments altered fermentation as evidenced by the change in faecal VFA, this was not accompanied by a decrease in faecal LPS. The strategies employed in this study had limited effects on large intestinal fermentation.
K E Y W O R D Scalcium carbonate, lipopolysaccharide, magnesium oxide, sodium bicarbonate | 803 NEIDERFER Et al.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.