Immunological detection of occult blood in faecal samples seems to show more adenomas and carcinomas (particularly early lesions) than the Hemoccult II kit and has a rate of false positive results that is acceptably low.
Summary The ability of a highly sensitive gel immunodiffusion technique to detect faecal occult blood in control subjects and in patients with colorectal carcinoma, was compared to that of Hemoccult II. In 1,200 samples from 200 control subjects, 3.3% were positive by the immunological technique, 5.0% by Hemoccult II with rehydration and 2.3% without rehydration, representing 7.5%, 10.5% and 5.0% of subjects, respectively. A total of 2 carcinomas and 6 polyps were detected in the 27 positive subjects. (Doran & Hardcastle, 1982). The proportion of false negative results can be diminished by using kits of higher sensitivity or by preliminary rehydration of the faecal specimens, but both give an increased proportion of false positive results (Frommer & Logue, 1981;Winawer et al., 1980 Materials and methods SubjectsTwo hundred members of the general public (aged 61.6 +10.2y) who agreed to take part in bowel cancer screening studies and 40 patients with colorectal carcinomas (aged 67.0+12.1y), collected 6 faecal smears on filter paper from six bowel actions for immunological testing. During the last three bowel actions, Hemoccult II cards (containing two sample windows for each bowel action, giving a total of 6 samples per card) were also used. In order to reduce the numbers of false positive results with Hemoccult II, the subjects were asked to abstain from eating red meat (but chicken and fish
No abstract
We would like to comment on the discussion of false positive results in "Immunochemical Detection of Fecal Occult Blood" following the paper by McDonald et al. ' The St. Vincent's Hospital Bowel Cancer Screening Unit has been using fecal occult blood testing with an immunological technique for two years and has previously reported some of its results. Z We found that of 200 control subjects, over the age of 40 years, 4% had positive results on immunological testing but had no colorectal carcinoma, polyps, or other pathology on colonoscopy. Evaluation of results obtained in our screening programme, over a period of 18 months, showed that false positivity rates for Hemoccult 11, without moistening of fecal specimens, to be 1.9%. With moistening the value increased to 3.9'7'0, which was the same figure obtained with our immunological test on six fecal specimens. However, the immunological test gave a much higher pick-up rate of carcinomas and polyps than the moistened Hemoccult I1 test.j The above figures refer to a true positive being only a patient demonstrated to have a carcinoma or adenoma of the large bowel. It is important when discussing false positive results to agree what constitutes a true positive result. Although a person may have had bleeding from hemorrhoids, ulcerative colitis, or other lesions of the bowel, from the point of view of bowel cancer screening these are effectively false positive results. We would further disagree with the comment of Williams and Hunter4 that the major non-neoplastic cause of a positive immunochemical test is bleeding from hemorrhoids. A person may have a positive immunochemical test and have hemorrhoids but it is uncommon, in our experience, that hemorrhoids can be assigned with any confidence as the cause of the positive test. Immunological detection of fecal occult blood. Aust NZ J Med 1984; 14: 105-10. 2. Frommer DJ, Kapparis A. Relationship between site of colorectal carcinomas and fecal immuno-reactive hemoglobin concentrations. Aust NZ J Med 1984; 14: 316. 3. Kapparis A, Brown M, Frommer DJ. Early results in the use of an immunological technique in occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. Aust NZ J Med 1985; IS: 160. 4. Williams JAR, Hunter R. Immunochemical detection of fecal occult blood. Aust NZ J Med 1985; 15: 81. REPLYThe purpose of the communication of Frommer et a/. appears to be to define what is meant by the term "positive" in relation to testing for occult blood in feces in the context of screening for colorectal neoplasia. Whilst we can appreciate the point that if the object of the screening test is only to detect colorectal neoplasia, then positive results in the absence of demonstrated neoplasia are rightly regarded as false positives. As the immunochemical tests are 100% specific for human blood, and as we have demonstrated that in almost all cases where a positive test has been found, a lesion is demonstrable which could have caused the positive test,' and in the majority of these cases the lesions are significant, it is reasonable to refer ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.