BackgroundClinical trials have not yet compared the efficacy of capsaicin 8% patch with current standard therapy in peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP).ObjectivesHead‐to‐head efficacy and safety trial comparing the capsaicin patch with pregabalin in PNP.MethodsOpen‐label, randomized, multicentre, non‐inferiority trial. Patients with PNP, aged 18–80 years, were randomly assigned to either the capsaicin 8% patch (n = 282) or an optimised dose of oral pregabalin (n = 277), and assessed for a ≥30% mean decrease in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score from baseline to Week 8. Secondary endpoints included optimal therapeutic effect (OTE), time‐to‐onset of pain relief and treatment satisfaction.ResultsThe capsaicin 8% patch was non‐inferior to pregabalin in achievement of a ≥30% mean decrease in NPRS score from baseline to Week 8 (55.7% vs. 54.5%, respectively; Odds ratio: 1.03 [95% CI: 0.72, 1.50]). The proportion of patients achieving OTE at Week 8 was 52.1% for the capsaicin 8% patch versus 44.8% for pregabalin (difference: 7.3%; 95% CI: −0.9%, 15.6%). The median time‐to‐onset of pain relief was significantly shorter for capsaicin 8% patch versus pregabalin (7.5 vs. 36.0 days; Hazard ratio: 1.68 [95% CI: 1.35, 2.08]; p < 0.0001). Treatment satisfaction was also significantly greater with the capsaicin 8% patch versus pregabalin. TEAEs were mild‐to‐moderate in severity, and resulted in treatment discontinuation only with pregabalin (n = 24). Systemic adverse drug reactions ranged from 0 to 1.1% with capsaicin 8% patch and 2.5 to 18.4% with pregabalin.ConclusionsThe capsaicin 8% patch provided non‐inferior pain relief to an optimized dose of pregabalin in PNP, with a faster onset of action, fewer systemic side effects and greater treatment satisfaction.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of recombinant human interferon-beta (rHuIFN-beta 1a) were assessed following administration to 12 healthy male volunteers. Each subject received, in a double-blind, balanced, random-order, crossover sequence, single doses of 6 MIU of rHuIFN-beta 1a (Rebif) i.v., i.m., and s.c. or matching placebo on four occasions separated by washout periods of 1 week. Blood samples were collected at preset times for the measurement of serum IFN-beta levels and of intracellular 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase levels. Blood pressure, sitting heart rate, respiratory rate, oral body temperature, and tolerance were monitored regularly. All administrations of rHuIFN-beta 1a were well tolerated, although about half of the subjects had a flu-like syndrome, as expected. After i.v. bolus injection, the pharmacokinetics of rHuIFN-beta 1a were well described by a classic two-compartment model. Mean total clearance of rHuIFN-beta 1a was about 100 L.h-1. The distribution half-life was 5 min, and the terminal half-life was approximately 5 h. After i.m. or s.c. injection, serum IFN-beta profiles were rather flat, and about one sixth of the administered dose was available systemically. Extent and duration of clinical and biologic effects were independent of the route of administration and of the IFN-beta serum levels. Biologic pharmacodynamic effects persisted even when IFN-beta serum levels had returned to baseline and were still significantly elevated 3 days after a single dose. Because of the independence of the extent and duration of clinical and biologic pharmacodynamic effects from the route of administration and from the IFN-beta serum levels, the s.c route of administration is preferred in indications in which primarily an immunomodulatory action is sought. Predominantly antiviral and antiproliferative activity is enhanced by the i.v. route to provide adequate drug levels at the site of pathology, although its application is limited on practical grounds.

Tumour-specific antiserum was raised in sheep against idiotypic determinants on the surface immunoglobulin of neoplastic lymphocytes from a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (prolymphocytic variant). The complement-activating IgG1 subclass of the anti-idiotype was prepared from the serum in monodisperse form for infusion. Two treatments of 480 and 1200 mg caused the white-cell count to fall by one-third and one-half respectively. However, there was a rapid resurgence, so that by 8 days after each treatment the counts were restored to approximately 85% of their former levels. No change was noted in the size of spleen or lymph nodes. Each treatment probably destroyed 4-8 X 10(11) cells, some 10% of the total tumour load. The antibody was rapidly consumed, and there was evidence of heavy utilization of complement.

No abstract

The number of clinic consultations for condylomata acuminata (genital warts) has increased substantially during the last 30 years. Most infections produce benign lesions but a few types may be associated with cervical and penile cancers. Interferons (IFN) have shown antiviral properties to these infections and IFN-beta in particular has demonstrated a specific cytopathic effect in humans. A total of 124 patients with condylomata acuminata, the majority of whom had failed previous therapy, were treated intralesionally with either recombinant human interferon-beta la (r-hIFN-beta-1a) or placebo. Up to 6 lesions were treated in each patient, and injections were made 3 times per week for a total of 9 injections. The patients were then followed up for 3 months. Efficacy assessments at all time points (day 19, week 6 and month 3) showed a clear advantage for the r-hIFN-beta-1a interferon-beta treatment. Patients receiving r-hIFN-beta-1a showed a greater proportion of treatment success in terms of the complete or partial reduction (at least 50%) of the total area of the treated lesions. The treatment was also well tolerated. Headache, flu-like symptoms and asthenia were more common in patients receiving r-hIFN-beta-1a, but these adverse events were generally mild in severity and rarely led to patient withdrawal. It was concluded that r-hIFN-beta-1a has good efficacy in condylomata acuminata, and therefore presents a useful therapeutic alternative in this hard-to-treat condition.