Summary
Background
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. In short‐term the treatment has been shown to be safe, however, there are no large, long‐term follow‐up studies looking into the potential adverse effects.
Aim
To analyse the long‐term effect of FMT treatment in patients with recurrent C. difficile infection and to compare the outcome to antibiotic treated patients.
Methods
Altogether 84 patients of which 45 received a FMT treatment and 39 served as controls receiving antibiotics for the infection were followed on average for 3.8 years. Their recovery and medical status was evaluated using a retrospective questionnaire, determining their quality of life, gastrointestinal symptoms and new diseases potentially related to the FMT.
Results
There was no difference in the incidence of severe diseases (inflammatory bowel disease, cancer, autoimmune disease, allergy, neurological diseases) between the patient groups. In addition, weight gain did not differ between treatment groups. The FMT treated patients reported that their bowel habits improved significantly faster, they had less irregular bowel function and less symptoms of upper GI‐tract when compared to the patients treated with antibiotics. Significantly more patients in FMT‐group reported that their mental health improved after the treatment. The willingness to receive FMT treatment for potential new C. difficile infection was significantly higher in both treatment groups compared to other treatment options.
Conclusion
Our study highlights that FMT is a durable, safe and acceptable treatment option for patients with recurrent C. difficile infection also in long term, and it shows potential benefits over antimicrobial treatment.
Linked Content
This article is linked to Jalanka et al and Mullish papers. To view these articles visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14443 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14626.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.