The distinction between benign and malignant cartilaginous tumors of bone is one of the most difficult subjects in surgical pathology. The grading of chondrosarcoma also seems to vary considerably among pathologists. However, clinical management differs. The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate interobserver variability in histological diagnosis and grading of central cartilaginous tumors and (2) to assess the diagnostic value of defined histologic parameters in differentiating enchondroma and central grade I chondrosarcoma. The interobserver variability was assessed using a set of 16 cases evaluated by 18 specialized pathologists. Subsequently, 20 enchondromas and 37 central grade I chondrosarcomas diagnosed in a multidisciplinary team with full clinical, radiologic, and pathologic data available with 10 years of follow-up were collected. Cytologic and tissue-architectural features were assessed to find an optimal set of parameters to differentiate enchondroma from central grade I chondrosarcoma. We demonstrate considerable variation in the histologic assessment of cartilaginous tumors (weighted kappa=0.78). The distinction between enchondroma and grade I chondrosarcoma was shown to be the most disconcordant (kappa coefficient=0.54), and also the differentiation between grade I and grade II chondrosarcoma was subjected to variation (kappa coefficient=0.80). The application of a combination of 5 parameters (high cellularity, presence of host bone entrapment, open chromatin, mucoid matrix quality, and age above 45 y) allowed optimal differentiation between enchondromas and central grade I chondrosarcomas. With a classification tree based on 2 parameters (mucoid matrix degeneration more than 20% and/or host bone entrapment present), 54 of the 57 (94.7%) cases were assessed correctly (sensitivity 95% and specificity 95%). Our study confirms the low reliability of the diagnosis and grading of central chondrosarcoma. However, these classifications guide therapeutic decision making in daily practice. Therefore, we propose a classification model that, combined with a tailored radiologic assessment, may improve reliability of the diagnosis of cartilaginous tumors.

No abstract

Enchondromas and conventional central chondrosarcomas are, respectively, benign and malignant hyaline cartilage-forming tumours that originate in the medulla of bone. In order to gain a better understanding of the molecular process underlying malignant transformation of enchondroma, and to investigate whether there is a biological difference between conventional central cartilaginous tumours and those of enchondromatosis or with phalangeal localization, a series of 64 enchondromas (phalanx, n = 21; enchondromatosis, n = 15) and 89 chondrosarcomas (phalanx, n = 17; enchondromatosis, n = 13) was collected. Indian Hedgehog (IHH)/parathyroid hormone related peptide (PTHrP) signalling, an important pathway in chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation within the normal growth plate, was studied by immunohistochemical analysis of the expression of PTHrP, PTHR1, Bcl-2, p21, cyclin D1, and cyclin E.

Low-grade surface tumours of bone may theoretically be treated by hemicortical resection, retaining part of the circumference of the cortex. An inlay allograft may be used to reconstruct the defect. Since 1988 we have performed 22 hemicortical procedures in selected patients with low-grade parosteal osteosarcoma (6), peripheral chondrosarcoma (6) and adamantinoma (10). Restricted medullary involvement was not a contraindication for this procedure. There was no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis at a mean follow-up of 64 months (27 to 135). Wide resection margins were obtained in 19 patients. All allografts incorporated completely and there were no fractures or infections. Fractures of the remaining hemicortex occurred in six patients and were managed successfully by casts or by osteosynthesis. The functional results were excellent or good in all except one patient. Hemicortical procedures for selected cases of low-grade surface tumours give excellent oncological and functional outcomes. There was complete remodelling and fewer complications when compared with larger intercalary procedures. The surgery is technically demanding but gives good clinical results.

No abstract