No abstract

In our cohort, patients in Rheumatology had a significantly later SLE onset than those in Nephrology. Anti-malarial drugs were mostly prescribed by rheumatologists and internists and less frequently by nephrologists, and appeared to be associated with less active SLE.

IntroductionThe use of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) has dramatically reduced HIV-1 associated morbidity and mortality. However, HIV-1 infected individuals have increased rates of morbidity and mortality compared to the non-HIV-1 infected population and this appears to be related to end-organ diseases collectively referred to as Serious Non-AIDS Events (SNAEs). Circulating miRNAs are reported as promising biomarkers for a number of human disease conditions including those that constitute SNAEs. Our study sought to investigate the potential of selected miRNAs in predicting mortality in HIV-1 infected ART treated individuals.Materials and MethodsA set of miRNAs was chosen based on published associations with human disease conditions that constitute SNAEs. This case: control study compared 126 cases (individuals who died whilst on therapy), and 247 matched controls (individuals who remained alive). Cases and controls were ART treated participants of two pivotal HIV-1 trials. The relative abundance of each miRNA in serum was measured, by RTqPCR. Associations with mortality (all-cause, cardiovascular and malignancy) were assessed by logistic regression analysis. Correlations between miRNAs and CD4+ T cell count, hs-CRP, IL-6 and D-dimer were also assessed.ResultsNone of the selected miRNAs was associated with all-cause, cardiovascular or malignancy mortality. The levels of three miRNAs (miRs -21, -122 and -200a) correlated with IL-6 while miR-21 also correlated with D-dimer. Additionally, the abundance of miRs -31, -150 and -223, correlated with baseline CD4+ T cell count while the same three miRNAs plus miR-145 correlated with nadir CD4+ T cell count.DiscussionNo associations with mortality were found with any circulating miRNA studied. These results cast doubt onto the effectiveness of circulating miRNA as early predictors of mortality or the major underlying diseases that contribute to mortality in participants treated for HIV-1 infection.

BackgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led to a steep increase in hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions for acute respiratory failure worldwide. Early identification of patients at risk of clinical deterioration is crucial in terms of appropriate care delivery and resource allocation. We aimed to evaluate and compare the prognostic performance of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), Confusion, Uraemia, Respiratory Rate, Blood Pressure and Age ≥65 (CURB-65), Respiratory Rate and Oxygenation (ROX) index and Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium (4C) score to predict death and ICU admission among patients admitted to the hospital for acute COVID-19 infection.Methods and analysisConsecutive adult patients admitted to the Geneva University Hospitals during two successive COVID-19 flares in spring and autumn 2020 were included. Discriminative performance of these prediction rules, obtained during the first 24 hours of hospital admission, were computed to predict death or ICU admission. We further exluded patients with therapeutic limitations and reported areas under the curve (AUCs) for 30-day mortality and ICU admission in sensitivity analyses.ResultsA total of 2122 patients were included. 216 patients (10.2%) required ICU admission and 303 (14.3%) died within 30 days post admission. 4C score had the best discriminatory performance to predict 30-day mortality (AUC 0.82, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.85), compared with SOFA (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.78), qSOFA (AUC 0.59, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.62), CURB-65 (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.78) and ROX index (AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.72). ROX index had the greatest discriminatory performance (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.83) to predict ICU admission compared with 4C score (AUC 0.62, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.66), CURB-65 (AUC 0.60, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.64), SOFA (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.77) and qSOFA (AUC 0.59, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.62).ConclusionScores including age and/or comorbidities (4C and CURB-65) have the best discriminatory performance to predict mortality among inpatients with COVID-19, while scores including quantitative assessment of hypoxaemia (SOFA and ROX index) perform best to predict ICU admission. Exclusion of patients with therapeutic limitations improved the discriminatory performance of prognostic scores relying on age and/or comorbidities to predict ICU admission.

Little is known on the long-lasting humoral response and the T cell activation induced by SARS-COV2 mRNA vaccines in patients with cancer. The study assessed the efficacy of the SARS-COV2 mRNA vaccines through measuring the seroconversion rate at pre-specified time points and the effect on the T cell immunity in patients with cancers. The study included 131 adult patients with solid or haematological cancer, who received SARS-COV2 mRNA vaccines. 96.2% of them exhibited adequate antibody response to the SARS-COV2 mRNA vaccines 2 months after the booster dose. SARS-COV2 mRNA vaccines could induce T cell activation, however this is more likely in patients who have a positive seroconversion (94%) compared to the patients who did not (50%). Further research into the clinical relevance of low antibodies titers and lack of T cell activity is required to set up an effective vaccination strategy within this group of patients.

In the context of a lack of a gold standard for the diagnosis of neurosyphilis due to either nonspecific or nonsensitive tests, we present in this article a new promising tool highly specific for NS diagnosis. This new test involves measuring an intrathecal synthesis index of specific anti- Treponema IgG by ELISA.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: Although the 5-year survival for pediatric cancer in Switzerland today is over 85%, two thirds of the survivors will develop chronic health conditions due to the disease or to the toxicity of treatments. In this context, a long-term personalized follow-up program (LTFU program), was set up at the University Hospitals of Geneva (HUG) since 2015. We aimed to describe this program, more particularly the specialized follow-ups set up, the cumulative burden of the chronic health conditions, and finally assess the satisfaction of patients and/or their parents with it. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective study was performed where data on follow-ups and chronic health conditions were collected from medical charts of people who had childhood cancer and who participated in the LTFU program. Chronic health conditions were classified and graded in severity with the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE) classification, version 5.0. This study was completed by a satisfaction survey among patients and/or their parents. RESULTS: Out of 83 eligible patients, 51 (61.4%) accepted to participate, with an average age of 17.4 years (range, 10 to 35) at the time of study. Mean delay since end of treatment was 9.8 years (range: 4.5–31). The prevalence of any chronic health condition is 82.3%, 43.1% for having 1 or 2 chronic health conditions and 39.2% for having more than 3 chronic health conditions. The total number of Grade CTCAE 1–4 chronic health conditions was 118 for the 51 participants, with a mean of 2.3 (range, 0 to 7) disorders per patient. The most frequently affected systems were neurological (14.4%), musculoskeletal (13.6%), endocrine (9.3%) and renal (9.3%) systems. Sarcoma, central nervous system tumors and neuroblastoma were the diagnoses associated with the highest average number of chronic health conditions. Among the 118 questionnaires sent to patients and/or parents, we received 82 (69.5%) responses. The level of satisfaction was good to excellent for more than 90% of the participants, for all the items evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood cancer survivors present a significant number of chronic health conditions, confirming the need for appropriate long-term, multidisciplinary and patient-specific medical follow-up based on the primary diagnosis and therapies received. Moreover, the LTFU program at the HUG was highly appreciated by patients and/or their parents and this motivates its permanent conduct.

No abstract