Over the last decade, we have witnessed an academic battle between two competing concepts: 'competence' and 'capability'. Put simply, competence claims 'I will continue to do things to a satisfactory standard in the future because I have done them to a satisfactory standard in the past'. Capability claims, 'I could do things ably in the future because I have certain qualities that will enable me to do so'. This article argues that in the current educational turmoil, the competence-versus-capability debate is one battlefield too many, and that a strategic alliance between the two warring factions is necessary if either is to have any continuing practical effect in education and commerce. We provide a middle concept, 'capacity' in the role of matchmaker. We describe capacity as contextual intelligence and suggest that there is a spiral of capacity linking competence and capability in a practical symbiosis that grounds both in real world contexts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.