Background: Treatment of hypothyroidism with 3,5,3 0 -triiodothyronine (T 3 ) is controversial. A recent meta-analysis concludes that no evidence is present in favour of using T 3 . However, the analysis included a mixture of different patient groups and dose-regimens. Objective: To compare the effect of combination therapy with thyroxine (T 4 ) and T 3 versus T 4 monotherapy in patients with hypothyroidism on stable T 4 substitution. Study design: Double-blind, randomised cross-over. Fifty micrograms of the usual T 4 dose was replaced with either 20 mg T 3 or 50 mg T 4 for 12 weeks, followed by cross-over for another 12 weeks. The T 4 dose was regulated if needed, intending unaltered serum TSH levels. Evaluation: Tests for quality of life (QOL) and depression (SF-36, Beck Depression Inventory, and SCL-90-R) at baseline and after both treatment periods. Inclusion criteria: Serum TSH between 0.1 and 5.0 mU/l on unaltered T 4 substitution for 6 months. Results: A total of 59 patients (55 women); median age 46 years. When comparing scores of QOL and depression on T 4 monotherapy versus T 4 /T 3 combination therapy, significant differences were seen in 7 out of 11 scores, indicating a positive effect related to the combination therapy. Forty-nine percent preferred the combination and 15% monotherapy (PZ0.002). Serum TSH remained unaltered between the groups as intended. Conclusion: In a study design, where morning TSH levels were unaltered between groups combination therapy, (treated with T 3 20 mg once daily) was superior to monotherapy by evaluating several QOL, depression and anxiety rating scales as well as patients own preference.
A semiquantitative approach is probably as good as the more elaborately calculated radioiodine dose for treatment of hyperthyroidism. It is clearly more cost effective and allows the use of predetermined standard doses.
Three endocrinologists assessed thyroid function (hypothyroid, possibly hypothyroid, euthyroid, possibly hyperthyroid, or hyperthyroid), thyroid size (small, medium, or large), thyroid type (diffuse, nodular, or solitary nodule), and diagnosis and treatment options in 55 patients (47 women and 8 men) with a median age of 43 years (range 19 to 74) suspected of thyroid disease. The observers were presented stepwise for the (1) patient, clinical examination, and patient history; (2) blood tests; (3) 99mTc-pertechnetate scintigraphy; and (4) ultrasonography. The reproducibility was assessed by means of the K coefficient. Compared with evaluation of the patient alone, agreement on thyroid dysfunction was almost perfect when the results of the blood tests were known. The K values for pairs of observers rose significantly from 0.55 to 0.65 to 0.88 to 0.93. All three observers altered their opinion as to thyroid dysfunction in one third of the patients when the blood tests were known. Compared with evaluation of the patient alone, agreement on the morphology of the thyroid gland did not improve significantly in spite of access to thyroid scintigraphy; with the addition of thyroid ultrasound, agreement improved significantly for some pairs of observers. The three observers agreed on the rough estimate of thyroid size in only 36% of the patients. When all information was available, the three observers agreed on diagnosis and treatment category in 60% of the patients. Doctors should bear in mind the considerable observer variation when they evaluate patients with suspected thyroid disease.
In order to evaluate the reliability of clinical assessment of the thyroid gland, two specialists in endocrinology and two younger doctors independently examined 53 patients twice, and assessed whether they had a diffuse goitre, a multinodular goitre, a solitary nodule or a normal gland. In 30% of the patients all four observers were in agreement, whereas in 47% and 23% of the patients, two and three different diagnoses were given, respectively. Inter-observer variation was determined and kappa values between -0.04 and 0.54 were found. Intra-observer variation was smaller, revealing kappa values between 0.44 and 1.00. The present study suggests that clinical assessment of the thyroid gland may lead to misclassification of the type of thyroid disease, and thereby to a less than optimal choice of therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.