Intensive renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury did not decrease mortality, improve recovery of kidney function, or reduce the rate of nonrenal organ failure as compared with less-intensive therapy involving a defined dose of intermittent hemodialysis three times per week and continuous renal-replacement therapy at 20 ml per kilogram per hour. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00076219.)

In view of current uncertainty regarding the optimum route for iron supplementation in patients receiving recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO), a prospective randomized controlled study was designed to investigate this issue. All iron-replete renal failure patients commencing EPO who had a hemoglobin concentration < 8.5 g/dl and an initial serum ferritin level of 100 to 800 micrograms/liter were randomized into three groups with different iron supplementation: Group 1, i.v. iron dextran 5 ml every 2 weeks; Group 2, oral ferrous sulphate 200 mg tds; Group 3, no iron. All patients were treated with 25 U/kg of EPO thrice weekly subcutaneously. The hemoglobin concentration, reticulocyte count, serum ferritin, transferrin saturation, and EPO dose were monitored every two weeks for the first four months. Thirty-seven patients entered the study (12 i.v., 13 oral, 12 no iron). The three groups were equivalent with regard to age, sex, and other demographic details. Even allowing for dosage adjustments, the hemoglobin response in the group receiving i.v. iron (7.3 +/- 0.8 to 11.9 +/- 1.2 g/dl) was significantly greater than that for the other two groups (7.2 +/- 1.1 to 10.2 +/- 1.4 g/dl and 7.3 +/- 0.8 to 9.9 +/- 1.6 g/dl for Groups 2 and 3, respectively; P < 0.005 for both groups vs. Group 1 at 16 weeks). There was no difference between the groups supplemented with oral iron and no iron. Serum ferritin levels remained constant in those receiving i.v. iron (345 +/- 273 to 359 +/- 140 micrograms/liter), in contrast to the other two groups in which ferritin levels fell significantly (309 +/- 218 to 116 +/- 87 micrograms/liter and 458 +/- 206 to 131 +/- 121 micrograms/liter for Groups 2 and 3, respectively; P < 0.0005 for Group 1 vs. Group 2, and P < 0.005 for Group 1 vs. Group 3 at 16 weeks). Dosage requirements of EPO were less in Group 1 (1202 +/- 229 U/kg/16 weeks) than in Group 2 (1294 +/- 314 U/kg/16 weeks) or Group 3 (1475 +/- 311 U/kg/16 weeks; P < 0.05 vs. Group 1). The results of this study suggest that, even in iron-replete patients, those supplemented with i.v. iron have an enhanced hemoglobin response to EPO with better maintenance of iron stores and lower dosage requirements of EPO, compared with those patients receiving oral iron and no iron supplementation.

No abstract

No abstract

To define the relation between atrial pressures and the release of atrial natriuretic peptide, we measured plasma concentrations of the peptide in 26 patients with cardiac disease--11 with normal atrial pressures and 15 with elevated atrial pressures (11 of these 15 had elevated pressures in both atria). Mean peptide levels (+/- SEM) in the peripheral venous blood were increased in the 11 patients with cardiac disease and normal atrial pressures, as compared with 60 healthy controls (48 +/- 14 vs. 17 +/- 2 pmol per liter). In the patients with elevated atrial pressures, peptide concentrations were increased twofold in peripheral venous, right atrial, pulmonary arterial, and systemic arterial plasma, as compared with the concentrations in the patients with normal atrial pressures. A step-up in peptide concentration was seen between the venous and right atrial plasma (P less than 0.002) and between the pulmonary and systemic arterial plasma (P less than 0.01), suggesting release of the peptide from the atria. A linear relation was found between right atrial pressure and right atrial peptide concentration (r = 0.835, P less than 0.001) and between pulmonary wedge pressure and the systemic arterial peptide concentration (r = 0.866, P less than 0.001). Right atrial pressure and the peptide concentration both increased with exercise testing in the nine patients evaluated. We conclude that the release of atrial natriuretic peptide is at least partly regulated by right and left atrial pressures. Distinguishing the relative contributions of the two atria and defining the role of peptide release in the pathogenesis of heart failure will require further investigation.