PurposeA phase III trial assessed the efficacy of palonosetron plus dexamethasone given once in preventing acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following a broad range of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) regimens.MethodsThis multicentre, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial evaluated two different treatment groups. One group received palonosetron (0.25 mg intravenously) and dexamethasone (8 mg intravenously) before chemotherapy, while the other was administered the same regimen on day 1 followed by dexamethasone 8 mg orally on days 2 and 3. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; defined as no emetic episodes and no rescue medication) during the overall phase (days 1–5 after chemotherapy initiation). The non-inferiority margin was predefined as a 15% difference between groups in the primary endpoint.ResultsOf 332 chemotherapy-naïve patients included in the intention-to-treat analysis, 65.1% were female, and 35.2% received anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC)-based regimens. Overall CR rates were 67.5% for those administered dexamethasone only on day 1 (n = 166), and 71.1% for those also administered dexamethasone on days 2 and 3 (n = 166; difference −3.6% (95% confidence interval, −13.5 to 6.3)). CR rates were not significantly different between groups during the acute (0–24 h post-chemotherapy; 88.6% versus 84.3%; P = 0.262) and delayed phases (days 2–5; 68.7% versus 77.7%; P = 0.116).ConclusionsPalonosetron plus single-dose dexamethasone administered before common MEC regimens provide protection against acute and delayed CINV which is non-inferior to that of palonosetron plus dexamethasone for 3 days. However, the major benefit of the single-day regimen occurs in patients receiving non-AC MEC regimens.
BackgroundChemotherapy administration is a high-risk process. Aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, type, preventability, as well as potential and actual severity of outpatient chemotherapy prescribing errors in an Oncology Department where electronic prescribing is used.MethodsUp to three electronic prescriptions per patient record were selected from the clinical records of consecutive patients who received cytotoxic chemotherapy between January 2007 and December 2008. Wrong prescriptions were classified as incomplete, incorrect or inappropriate. Error preventability was classified using a four-point scale. Severity was defined according to the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Severity Scale.ResultsEight hundred and thirty-five prescriptions were eligible. The overall error rate was 20%. Excluding systematic errors (i.e. errors due to an initially faulty implementation of chemotherapy protocols into computerized dictionaries) from the analysis, the error rate decreased to 8%. Incomplete prescriptions were the majority. Most errors were deemed definitely preventable. According to error presumptive potential for damage, 72% were classified as minor; only 3% had the potential to produce major or catastrophic injury. Sixty-eight percent were classified as near misses; adverse drug events had no or little effect on clinical outcome.ConclusionsChemotherapy prescribing errors may arise even using electronic prescribing. Although periodic audits may be useful to detect common errors and guide corrective actions, it is crucial to get the computerized physician order entry system and set-ups correct before implementation.
Biweekly COI is feasible and active. Tolerability and ease of administration make the regimen well suited for downsizing hepatic colorectal metastases before curative surgery.
The need to control chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is continuously stimulating research to find better options for the optimal antiemetic care. Palonosetron is different from conventional serotonin receptor antagonists not only by the fact of having a longer half-life but also by higher binding affinity for serotonin receptors. It is the first agent in the class which is approved for preventing both delayed and acute emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Recent studies using palonosetron-based antiemetic regimens, as well as in the clinical setting of multiple-day chemotherapy, have been reported. Palonosetron plus dexamethasone given as a pre-treatment infusion was effective for preventing acute and delayed emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Palonosetron in combination with dexamethasone and aprepitant was highly effective in preventing emesis in the days following administration of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Treatment was well tolerated, with no unexpected adverse events. Multiple-day dosing of palonosetron plus dexamethasone was safe and effective for prevention of emesis induced by 5-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy. There was no evidence of cumulative toxicity when palonosetron was given three times over 5 days. Further evidence from ongoing clinical trials with palonosetron with or without dexamethasone will be available soon. Palonosetron represents an useful addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of palonosetron in combination with dexamethasone compared with that of older serotonin receptor antagonists combined with dexamethasone. However, palonosetron may offer advantages of convenience over the short-acting older antagonists due to its ability to be given as a single intravenous dose prior to chemotherapy.
Neuroendocrine tumors are rare neoplasms originating from cells belonging to a diffuse or confined neuroendocrine system and characterized by a significant histopatologic and biologic heterogeneity. Timely diagnosis is delayed because they are often clinically silent for their low differentiation grade and the absence of any symptom due to abnormal hormone release. For these reasons, many neuroendocrine tumor patients are not treated medically for metastatic or inoperable disease. Medical treatments include biotherapy, with interferon-α and somatostatin analogues, and chemotherapy. Somastostatin analogues are widely used in patients with symptoms and with carcinoids of low differentiation grade. Interferon-α is used alone or in combination with somatostatin analogues. Chemotherapy is active in patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. The therapeutic regimen commonly used is the combination of cisplatinum and etoposide. In conclusion, no standard treatment for NET has yet been identified, and the response criteria suggested by ITMO remain a reference point. The clinical aspect of the disease and biologic features suggest the identification of neuroendocrine tumors patients suitable for the appropriate therapies. On these bases, it is recommended that diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors be carried out at specialized oncological centers involved in clinical trials.
A new method to test the sensitivity of human tumor cells has been developed. A suspension of mechanically dissociated tumor cells is kept in continuous incubation for 24h, in cultures with antineoplastic agents. Drug induced cell cycle perturbations are monitored by flow cytometric computer analysis and DNA distributions of the cells stained with propidium iodide are expressed in percentage. The test is used in 15 head and neck human solid tumors. The drugs tested were: VCR, EpiDx, CDDP, MTX, 5-FU, CPM, BLM. The results obtained reveal that tumor sensitivity varies independently from the stage and malignity grading. Therapeutic combinations are assigned by selecting the drugs on the basis of the individual in vitro response.
9620 Background: We have recently shown non-inferiority in preventing acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with MEC between the PALO plus 1-day DEX and PALO plus 3-day DEX regimens. Planned analysis stratified by type of chemotherapy (anthracycline + cyclophosphamide [AC] group or patients receiving at least one moderately emetogenic agent according to modified Hesketh classification) has been performed. Methods: A total of 332 chemo-naïve patients with solid tumors were randomized to receive a single IV dose of PALO 0.25 mg plus DEX 8 mg IV on day 1 of chemotherapy (arm A; n=166) or the same regimen followed by DEX 8 mg orally on days 2 and 3 (arm B; n=166). Endpoints included complete response rates (CR: no emetic episodes [EE], no rescue antiemetics; primary endpoint) and proportion of patients with no EE throughout the 5 days after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Subgroups were analyzed by two-sided chi-square test. Results: Per-protocol population included 324 patients (65% women; median age 57.5 years); 35% received AC regimens, and 65% other MEC regimens. There were no significant differences between arms in CR rates according to the type of chemotherapy: 1) CR rates on AC regimens (arm A, 55.8% versus arm B, 60.7%; p=0.599); and 2) CR rates on other MEC regimens (arm A, 68.5% versus arm B, 72%; p=0.576). No significant differences between arms were also observed in the rates of patients with no EE: 1) emesis-free patients on AC regimens (arm A, 78.8% versus arm B, 73.8%; p=0.528); 2) emesis-free patients on other MEC regimens (arm A, 83.8% versus arm B, 90%; p=0.184); 3) nausea-free patients on AC regimens (arm A, 38.5% versus arm B, 44.3%; p=0.533); and 4) nausea-free patients on other MEC regimens (arm A, 58.6% versus arm B, 64%; p=0.418). Conclusions: The single-day regimen of PALO and DEX can provide effective protection against acute and delayed emesis from AC- and MEC-based regimens while avoiding to unnecessarily prolong treatment with DEX. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.