A precise and reliable method, using liquid chromatography combined with ion trap based mass spectrometry, for the determination of three endogenous estrogens, namely, estrone, estradiol, and estriol, and two synthetic estrogens, ethinyl estradiol and diethylstilbestrol, in environmental water samples was developed. Optimization of the parameter settings of the ion source and mass analyzer as well as evaluation of solvent composition were carried out by continuous introduction of standards through a syringe pump. In negative ion mode the electrospray ionization source gave acceptable results. The optimum solvent used consisted of water/acetonitrile, with no volatile bases or buffers added. A simple, off-line, manual solid-phase extraction method was developed for sample preparation of environmental water samples. Recoveries were over 86% for all compounds. The method was validated and found to be linear, selective, and robust. For analysis of a 50-mL sample, the limit of detection (LOD) ranged from 3.2 to 10.6 ng/L for all compounds, and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) from 10.6 to 35.0 ng/L. Within-day (n = 5) and total (n = 5) reproducibility were investigated at three different concentration levels and ranged from 6.2 to 9.5% and 9.4 to 12.1%, respectively. Finally, the method was applied to real-world samples.
The case history and toxicological findings of an overdose fatality involving 4-methylthioamphetamine (4-MTA) and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) are reported along with a description of the analytical method. Detection and quantitation of 4-MTA and MDMA were performed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using phentermine as internal standard. Application of this technique to a variety of matrices allowed an insight in the distribution of 4-MTA. Several blood samples including femoral vein blood (5.23 mg/L), urine (95.5 mg/L), vitreous humor (1.31 mg/L), bile (36.4 mg/L), and numerous tissue samples such as liver (30.8 mg/kg), spleen (4.10 mg/kg), and frontal lobe (31.7 mg/kg) were assayed. These values indicated that 4-MTA could be identified as the cause of this fatality, whereas the concentrations of MDMA, also described, are less important because the concentrations found are lower. This case reports, for the first time, an extensive toxicological analysis of 4-MTA, by which the data presented may shed some light on the distribution of 4-MTA.
A comparative study of three atmospheric-pressure ionization (API) sources for liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), namely pneumatically assisted electrospray or ionspray (IS), atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization (APCI), and sonic spray (SS), with respect to the influence of the eluent composition on the ionization of morphine, is presented. The effect of organic modifiers, volatile acids, and buffer systems (with and without pH adjustment) in the LC mobile phase on the ionization efficiency of each interface is described. We conclude that for all three ion sources, the composition of the liquid phase had a serious impact on the ionization of the target compound. For IS and SS, very similar behavior towards the LC eluent was observed. In both cases, an increase in organic modifier resulted in an increase in ionization, while an increasing amount of volatile acid or buffer caused signal suppression. APCI, on the other hand, proved to respond completely differently towards the changes in the eluent. Again, an increased ionization was observed with an increase in organic modifier content but this time also in the presence of mobile phase additives like acids or buffers. Finally, we concluded that APCI proved to be the preferred ion source for the test compound because of its robust character and its direct applicability in traditional LC analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.