This pooled analysis of the EORTC-RBG datasets confirmed the strong and independent prognostic value of uPA and PAI-1 in primary breast cancer. For patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer, uPA and PAI-1 measurements in primary tumors may be especially useful for designing individualized treatment strategies.

High TK values are an important risk factor in node-negative patients and seem to be associated with a beneficial effect of adjuvant FAC or FEC in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. The rationale of chemotherapy for patients with slowly proliferating tumors has to be discussed from a risk-benefit point of view.

Only a few markers have been instrumental in the diagnosis of cancer. In contrast, tumor markers play a critical role in the monitoring of patients. The patient’s clinical status and response to treatment can be evaluated rapidly using the tumor marker half-life (t1/2) and the tumor marker doubling time (DT). This report reviews the interest of determining these kinetic parameters for prostate-specific antigen, human chorionic gonadotropin, α-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen (CA) 125, and CA 15-3. A rise in tumor markers (DT) is a yardstick with which benign diseases can be distinguished from metastatic disease, and the DT can be used to assess the efficacy of treatments. A decline in the tumor marker concentration (t1/2) is a predictor of possible residual disease if the timing of blood sampling is soon after therapy. The discrepancies in results obtained by different groups may be attributable to the multiplicity of immunoassays, the intrinsic characteristics of each marker (e.g., antigen specificity, molecular heterogeneity, and associated forms), individual factors (e.g., nonspecific increases and renal and hepatic diseases) and methods used to calculate kinetics (e.g., exponential models and timing of blood sampling). This kinetic approach could be of interest to optimize patient management.

Among the methodological approaches of tumor proliferation, thymidine kinase (TK) and thymidylate synthase (TS) assays take into account the specific pathways of pyrimidine synthesis. Studies pointing to a prognostic value of TK and TS in breast cancer involved small numbers of patients. We investigated the prognostic value of these enzymes and their combination in a large retrospective multicenter study. Nine hundred eight T1T2, N0N1, M0 primary breast cancer samples (median follow‐up 68 months) were tested. TK and TS were measured in cytosols by using standardized radioenzymatic methods. Although a positive correlation was obtained between TK and TS (p<10−5), major discrepancies were observed in some tumors. High levels of both enzymes were associated with large tumor size, histological grade III and steroid receptor‐negative tumors. Univariate analysis showed that TK, TS and their combination were predictive of poor metastasis‐free (MFS) (p < 10−4; p=0.004; p < 10−4) and disease‐free survival (DFS) (p < 10−4; p=0.007; p=0.0001). TK was selected as an independent factor for MFS in Cox analysis. It was the only variable selected in node‐negative patients. Subgroups with specific outcomes, with possible therapeutic implications, were identified: a) in node‐negative patients not receiving adjuvant treatment, TK values in the 4th quartile were associated with poor MFS (p=0.0002) and DFS (p=0.0005) as compared to the other quartiles; b) in node‐positive patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, low levels of both TK and TS were associated with the highest survival rates (MFS: p=0.04; DFS: p=0.03). Int. J. Cancer 87:860–868, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

To study the role of ras, p53 genes and HPV virus (16 and 18) in the development of prostate cancer, we analyzed tissue sections from 27 patients affected with carcinomas (stages A to D) and from 24 patients with adenomas. Mutations of H, K and N-ras and p53 (exons 2-9) were studied by SSCP and DNA sequencing. Accumulation of p53 protein was studied by immunohistochemistry on tissue sections. Tumors were also analyzed for the presence of HPV16 and -18 sequences by PCR and DNA hybridization with sequence-specific oligonucleotides. No mutation was found in the three ras genes studied, either in carcinomas or adenomas. By SSCP analysis we identified p53 mutations in only 2 of 19 carcinomas studied, both in exon 7. Immunohistochemical results strongly correlate with the SSCP results: p53 protein was positive in tumors with p53 mutation but not in others; 32% of studied adenomas had detectable HPV16 DNA, while 53% of carcinomas were HPV16+. Among these I presented a p53 mutation. No HPV18 E6 sequence could be detected. Our data show that in prostate tumors from France, mutations of p53 and ras are rare events but that these tumors display detectable HPV16 DNA at a high frequency. The low incidence of p53 mutation, associated to a significant proportion of tumors showing HPV16 DNA, could suggest that in prostate cancer HPV16 infection could participate in p53 inactivation by E6.