Pancreatic pseudocysts in 83 patients were classified according to clinical and radiographic criteria. Group I (45 patients) had acute, 'post-necrotic' pseudocysts with normal pancreatic duct anatomy and rarely duct-pseudocyst communication. Percutaneous drainage was curative in all patients in whom it was used. Group II (26 patients) included 'post-necrotic' pseudocysts developing in patients already suffering from chronic pancreatitis. The pancreatic duct was diseased but not strictured, and duct-pseudocyst communication was often present. Percutaneous drainage is possible for such patients but it may have to be prolonged; surgical internal drainage was usually successful. Group III (12 patients) had chronic 'retention' pseudocysts. The pancreatic duct was grossly diseased and strictured and duct-pseudocyst communication was present in all cases. Percutaneous drainage is contraindicated and surgical internal drainage has a high recurrence rate. Operative procedures in this group should address the specific ductal pathology. An improved classification of pseudocysts could help the surgeon to choose the most appropriate form of treatment.
Controversy still surrounds the management of necrotic and septic complications of acute pancreatitis. A review of the literature of the past decade dealing with the surgical treatment of pancreatic necrosis, pancreatic abscess and infected pancreatic necrosis has been undertaken. Three main patterns of management could be identified: (1) 'conventional treatment', consisting of pancreatic resection or necrosectomy with drainage; (2) 'local lavage', consisting of necrosectomy followed by regional lavage; and (3) 'open management', with resection or necrosectomy followed by planned multiple re-explorations. From this review it appears that local lavage and open management offer better survival prospects than conventional treatment. Open abdomen techniques, however, are associated with an increased risk of complications, such as colonic necrosis, intestinal fistula, and intra-abdominal bleeding. Excellent results can be achieved in specialized centres with any of the three methods, provided adequate debridement and prompt reoperations are undertaken if the septic state persists.
We classify pancreatic pseudocysts in 3 types: post-necrotic type I, related to acute pancreatitis; post-necrotic type II, related to an acute attack superimposed on chronic pancreatitis; and retention type III, due to chronic pancreatitis with ductal stricture. A prospective study on percutaneous catheter drainage of post-necrotic pseudocysts (type I and II) was undertaken from 1987 to 1990. Twenty-three pseudocysts in 21 patients were drained. Overall recurrence rate was 4%; 2 patients had fistulization of the catheter into bowel; no deaths occurred. The procedure was successful in all type I cysts; in type II cysts it was associated with prolonged drainage and increased risk of complications when cyst-duct communication was present. Percutaneous drainage has no role to play in type III retention cysts. Guidelines regarding indications for treatment and the techniques employed are described.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.