This review focuses on the potential role of site- and event-selective adenosinergic drugs in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Adenosine is released from the myocardium and vessels in response to various forms of stress and acts on four receptor subtypes (A1, A2A, A2B and A3). Adenosine is an important endogenous substance with important homeostatic activity in the regulation of cardiac function and circulation. Adenosine receptors are also involved in the modulation of various cellular events playing crucial role in physiological and pathological processes of the cardiovascular system. These actions are associated to activation of distinct adenosine receptor subtypes, therefore drugs targeting specific adenosine receptors might be promising therapeutic tools in treatment of several disorders including various forms of cardiac arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, angina pectoris, chronic heart failure, etc. Recently, in addition to subtype-specific adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists, a number of substances that enhance adenosine receptor activation locally at the site where the release of endogenous adenosine is the most intensive have been developed. Thus global actions of adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists, as well as desensitization or down-regulation following chronic administration of these orthosteric compounds can possibly be avoided. We discuss the chemical, pharmacological and clinical features of these compounds: (1) inhibitors of membrane adenosine transporters (NBTI, dipyridamole), (2) inhibitors of adenosine deaminase (coformycin, EHNA), (3) inhibitors of adenosine kinase (tubercidin, aristeromycin), (4) inhibitors of AMP deaminase (GP3269), (5) activators of 5'-nucleotidase (methotrexate), (6) adenosine regulators (acadesine) and (7) allosteric adenosine receptor modulators (PD81723, LUF6000). The development of this type of substances might offer a novel therapeutic approach for treating cardiovascular diseases in the near future.

Adenosine is a ubiquitous, endogenous purine involved in a variety of physiological and pathophysiological regulatory mechanisms. Adenosine has been proposed as an endogenous antiarrhythmic substance to prevent hypoxia/ischemia-induced arrhythmias. Adenosine (and its precursor, ATP) has been used in the therapy of various cardiac arrhythmias over the past six decades. Its primary indication is treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, but it can be effective in other forms of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias, like sinus node reentry based tachycardia, triggered atrial tachycardia, atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia, or ventricular tachycardia based on a cAMP-mediated triggered activity. The main advantage is the rapid onset and the short half life (1- 10 sec). Adenosine exerts its antiarrhythmic actions by activation of A1 adenosine receptors located in the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes, as well as in activated ventricular myocardium. However, adenosine can also elicit A2A, A2B and A3 adenosine receptor-mediated global side reactions (flushing, dyspnea, chest discomfort), but it may display also proarrhythmic actions mediated by primarily A1 adenosine receptors (e.g. bradyarrhythmia or atrial fibrillation). To avoid the non-specific global adverse reactions, A1 adenosine receptor- selective full agonists (tecadenoson, selodenoson, trabodenoson) have been developed, which agents are currently under clinical trial. During long-term administration with orthosteric agonists, adenosine receptors can be internalized and desensitized. To avoid desensitization, proarrhythmic actions, or global adverse reactions, partial A1 adenosine receptor agonists, like CVT-2759, were developed. In addition, the pharmacologically "silent" site- and event specific adenosinergic drugs, such as adenosine regulating agents and allosteric modulators, might provide attractive opportunity to increase the effectiveness of beneficial actions of adenosine and avoid the adverse reactions.

Methylxanthines, such as theophylline, have been used to treat cardiorespiratory disorders, whereas caffeine is the most widely consumed psychoactive agent in various soft drinks. Because of the worldwide use of these drugs and the recently synthesized xanthine derivatives, an intensive research on the cardiac actions of these substances is under progress. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms involved in the actions of xanthine derivatives with special reference to their adenosine receptor antagonistic properties. The main basic and human studies on the action of xanthines on impulse initiation and conduction, as well as the electrophysiological and mechanical activity of the working myocardium will be overviewed. The potential beneficial and harmful actions of the methylxanthines will be discussed in light of the recent experimental and clinical findings. The pharmacological features and clinical observations with adenosine receptor subtype-specific xanthine antagonists are also the subject of this paper. Based on the adenosine receptor-antagonistic activity of these compounds, it can be raised that xanthine derivatives might inhibit the cardioprotective action of endogenous adenosine on various subtypes (A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3)) of adenosine receptors. Adenosine is an important endogenous substance with crucial role in the regulation of cardiac function under physiological and pathological conditions (preconditioning, postconditioning, ischemia/reperfusion injury). Recent clinical studies show that acute administration of caffeine or theophylline can inhibit various types of preconditioning in human subjects. There are no human studies, however, for the cardiovascular actions of long-term administration of these drugs. Upregulation of adenosine receptors and increased effectiveness of adenosine receptor-related cardiovascular functions have been observed after long-lasting treatment with methylxanthines. In addition, there are data indicating that blood adenosine level increases after long-term caffeine administration. Since the salutary actions (and also the adverse reactions) of a number of xanthine derivatives are repeatedly shown, the main goal is the development of novel structures that mimic the actions of the conventional methylxanthines as lead compounds, but their adenosine receptor subtype-specificity is higher, their water solubility is optimal, and the unwanted reactions are minimized.

In guinea pig main pulmonary artery precontracted with noradrenaline, adenosine exerted an initial phasic contraction followed by a tonic contraction and a slow relaxation. After selective blockade by 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX: 10 nM) of A1 receptors, adenosine only elicited a rapid relaxation. This initial response was characterized by use of adenosine (AR) and its analogues N6-cyclopentyl-adenosine (CPA), R-N6-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA), 2-chloroadenosine (CADO), 5'-N-ethyl-carboxamidoadenosine(NECA), N6-2-(4-aminophenyl) ethyl adenosine (APNEA) and 2-p-((carboxyethyl)-phenethylamino)-5'-carboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21 680). The order of potency of the adenosine analogues for purine-induced phasic contraction was CPA > R-PIA > NECA = APNEA > AR > CGS 21 680 suggesting the involvement of activation of A1 type adenosine receptors in the contraction phase. DPCPX antagonized the CPA-induced contraction with a pA2 = 9.27 +/- 0.26, but the Schild plot slope parameter was significantly lower than unity (0.58 +/- 0.09). In contrast, in electrically driven guinea pig atrial myocardium (a tissue reported to possess A1 receptors), the DPCPX-CPA antagonism was purely competitive (pA2 = 8.95 +/- 0.06; slope = 0.93 +/- 0.06). In the presence of 300 nM DPCPX, the rank order of potency for the purine-induced fast relaxation was NECA > CADO = AR > CGS 21 680 = R-PIA > CPA. The NECA- and adenosine-induced relaxation was influenced neither by 300 nM CP 66713 (an antagonist at A2a receptors), nor by endothelial removal and inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (100 microM NG-nitro-L-arginine: L-NOARG).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Chronic thyroxine treatment reduces the susceptibility of atrial myocardium to adenosine. While the possible role of membrane adenosine receptors in this action is supported by several studies, the involvement of intracellular adenosine mechanisms has not been defined. The present experiments were carried out in electrically driven euthyroid and hyperthyroid guinea pig atrial myocardium. The extracellular and intracellular actions of adenosine were analyzed pharmacologically by the use of specific blockers of membrane adenosine transport and intracellular adenosine deaminase (ADA). The involvement of phosphoprotein phosphatase, phospholamban, and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) in the adenosine-induced responses was also studied. The major findings were as follows: i) pD(2)- and E(max)-values for adenosine-induced decrease of mechanical activity were significantly reduced after an 8-day thyroxine treatment in atrial tissues; ii) in atria of thyroxine-treated animals, membrane purine transport inhibitors (dipyridamole, NBTI) induced similar leftward shifts in concentration-response curves for adenosine in both euthyroid and hyperthyroid atrial myocardium without altering the depressed E(max) values; iii) the leftward displacement evoked by inhibitors of intracellularly located ADA (coformycin, EHNA) was more striking in hyperthyroid than euthyroid myocardia. ADA inhibitors induced a complete reversal of the maximum adenosine actions; iv) inhibition by cantharidin of phosphoprotein phosphatases (after inhibition of ADA) reduced the adenosine-induced responses. This inhibition was stronger in hyperthyroid atria; v) pharmacological elimination of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase by cyclopiazonic acid did not alter the cardiac responses to adenosine and this was independent of thyroid status. It is suggested that distinct modulation of the extra- and intracellular adenosine actions is present in eu- and hyperthyroid hearts. In the latter, a predominance of intracellular adenosine mechanisms can be proposed.

No abstract

The study has analysed the action of histamine in the rabbit venous system and evaluated its potential role in contraction during increased venous pressure. We have found that a great variety exists in histamine sensitivity and H1-histamine receptor expression in various types of rabbit veins. Veins of the extremities (saphenous vein, femoral vein, axillary vein) and abdomen (common iliac vein, inferior vena cava) responded to histamine by a prominent, concentration-dependent force generation, whereas great thoracic veins (subclavian vein, superior vena cavas, intrathoracic part of inferior vena cava) and a pelvic vein (external iliac vein) exhibited slight sensitivity to exogenous histamine. The lack of reactivity to histamine was not due to increased activity of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) or heme oxygenase-1. H1-histamine receptor expression of veins correlated well with the histamine-induced contractions. Voltage-dependent calcium channels mediated mainly the histamine-induced force generation of saphenous vein, whereas it did not act in the inferior vena cava. In contrast, the receptor-operated channels were not involved in this response in either vein. Tyrosine phosphorylation occurred markedly in response to histamine in the saphenous vein, but not in the inferior vena cava. Histamine induced a prominent ρ kinase activation in both vessels. Protein kinase C and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) were not implicated in the histamine-induced intracellular calcium sensitization. Importantly, transient clamping of the femoral vein in animals caused a short-term constriction, which was inhibited by H1-histamine receptor antagonist in vivo. Furthermore, a significantly greater histamine immunopositivity was detected in veins after stretching compared to the resting state. We conclude that histamine receptor density adapts to the actual requirements of the circulation, and histamine liberated by the venous wall during increased venous pressure contributes to the contraction of vessels, providing a force for the venous return.

Adenosine receptors are expressed in various mammalian tissues where they mediate the effects of adenosine on cellular functions through a number of signalling mechanisms. 18F-NECA is the positron-emitting derivative of the A(2)-receptor agonist NECA (5'-n-ethyl-carboxamidoadenosine) and is a radioligand for PET imaging of adenosine receptors. Contractility and relaxation studies were performed on guinea pig atrial myocardium, pulmonary artery, and thoracic aorta to compare the pharmacological effects of NECA and F-NECA (a non-emitting derivative) on tissues. Furthermore, the effect of NECA and F-NECA on the potassium conductance was investigated in DDT1 MF-2 smooth muscle cells with the patch-clamp technique. Both NECA and F-NECA reduced the contractile force in atrial myocardium and evoked phasic contraction in pulmonary artery (A(1) adenosine-receptor-mediated actions) in a dose dependent manner; however, the apparent affinity was lower for F-NECA. No difference was found in relaxation induced by these compounds in 1 microM noradrenaline-precontracted aorta and pulmonary artery (in the presence of DPCPX, an A(1) adenosine receptor antagonist, tissue containing A(2B) adenosine receptors). NECA (5 microM) and F-NECA (5 microM) also decreased the peak current and accelerated activation and inactivation properties of the potassium channels, but F-NECA was less effective. These results suggest that while NECA and F-NECA are equivalent agonists of vascular A(2B) receptors, they mediate different changes of some parameters. When evaluating the data obtained by the use of radiolabelled ligands, one has to take into consideration the possible physiological effects of the ligands besides its binding properties to tissues.