Diabetic foot (DF) is a chronic and highly disabling complication of diabetes. The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is high in diabetic patients and, associated or not with peripheral neuropathy (PN), can be found in 50% of cases of DF. It is worth pointing out that the number of major amputations in diabetic patients is still very high. Many PAD diabetic patients are not revascularised due to lack of technical expertise or, even worse, negative beliefs because of poor experience. This despite the progress obtained in the techniques of distal revascularisation that nowadays allow to reopen distal arteries of the leg and foot. Italy has one of the lowest prevalence rates of major amputations in Europe, and has a long tradition in the field of limb salvage by means of an aggressive approach in debridement, antibiotic therapy and distal revascularisation. Therefore, we believe it is appropriate to produce a consensus document concerning the treatment of PAD and limb salvage in diabetic patients, based on the Italian experience in this field, to share with the scientific community.

Glycemic control in elderly persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is challenging because they are more likely to have other age-associated medical conditions and to experience hypoglycemia during intensive therapy. A best therapeutic strategy for these patients has not yet been defined. We investigated the efficacy and safety of adding once-daily insulin glargine to patients' current oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD) regimen, compared to increasing the OAD doses. The study enrolled patients aged 65 years or more, with poor glycemic control. Patients were randomized to two groups and entered a 3-week titration period in which their actual therapy was adjusted to meet the study's glycemic goals, by either adding insulin glargine to current therapy (group A, 27 patients) or increasing current OAD dosages (group B, 28 patients). Thereafter, therapies were continued unchanged for a 24-week observation period. The mean therapeutic dosage of insulin glargine in group A was 14.9 IU/day (SD = 5.0 IU/day). During the observation period, mean levels of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduced by 1.5% in group A and 0.6% in group B (P = 0.381). An HbA1c level <7.0% was achieved by five patients in each group. Mean fasting blood glucose levels reduced by 29 and 15% in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.029). Group A had fewer total hypoglycemic events (23 vs. 79, P = 0.030) and fewer patients experiencing any such event (9 vs. 17, P = 0.045). Neither a serious hypoglycemic event nor other adverse event occurred. These results suggest that, compared to increasing OAD dosage, the addition of insulin glargine to current OAD therapy is as effective but safer in terms of the risk for hypoglycemia in elderly patients with T2DM.

We evaluated in a randomized, assessor‐blinded, study the efficacy of a hydroxypropyl chitosan‐based nail lacquer (HPC‐NL) alone or in combination with oral biotin (HPC‐NL + B) in the treatment of brittle nail syndrome (BNS). Fifty subjects (21 men; mean age 64 years) with BNS were enrolled. Twenty‐six were randomly assigned to HPC‐NL and 24 to the HPC‐NL and biotin, 10 mg/daily (+B). Topical and oral treatments lasted for 4 consecutive months. The primary outcome was the evolution of the Onychodystrophy Global Severity Score (OGSS) assessing nail dystrophy, lamellar and longitudinal splitting, dyschromia, and pitting. At baseline, the OGSS, mean (SD), was 8.4 (2.1) in the HPC‐NL group and 11.8 (2.3) in the HPC‐NL + B group. The OGSS was significantly reduced during treatments in both groups. At Month 4, OGSS was reduced by 57% (HPC‐NL) and 62% (HPC‐NL + B). At the end of study period, the percentage of subjects with an OGSS reduction of ≥50% in comparison with baseline was 53% in the HPC‐NL group and 80% in the HPC‐NL + B group (p = .05). Both treatments were well tolerated. In subjects with BNS, HPC‐NL alone is associated with a clinically relevant improvement of nail appearance. The combination of HPC‐NL and oral biotin is associated with further clinical improvement.

Objective To perform an early economic evaluation of a system based on photodynamic advanced adjuvant therapy with photosensitizer RLP068/CI to facilitate the healing process of foot/leg skin lesions/ulcers with an excellent safety profile. Design An early short-term (10 weeks) cost-effectiveness and a budget impact analysis (over 5 years) comparing photodynamic therapy with photosensitizer RLP068/CI based (PDT-RLP068) system added to Standard of Care (SoC) vs SoC alone. Setting The Italian National Healthcare System perspective considering both the outpatient and the day-hospital regimen. Participants Hypothetical patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) grades I/IIB. Interventions The PDT-RLP068 system as an add-on to Standard of Care (SoC) vs SoC alone as the first-line treatment for the management of DFIs. Main Outcomes Days within which the clinical target was achieved and direct health costs for patients’ management. Results Additional costs generated by the use of the PDT-RLP068 system progressively decreased as time to reach the target induced by the novel system decreased. In the outpatient regimen, when time to reach clinical target decreased in the range 7–28 days, ICERs varied from about 1€ to 70€ for each additional day gained with clinical target achieved. The system was dominant when halving time to reach the target in the outpatient regimen and even for modest reduction of time in day-hospital regimen. In terms of budget impact, when considering day-hospital regimen, if the PDT-RLP068 based system allowed a shortened duration to reach the clinical target of between 7–28 days, BI was 8,100,000€ to 700,000€, with saving less than 2,000,000€ with 50% reduction of time. Considering the inpatient setting, the use of the PDT-RLP068 system would result in saving even with the modest impact on the time needed to activate the healing process. Conclusion The early economic evaluation performed suggested that, if the claimed effectiveness of the technology demonstrated in case reports and in preliminary clinical studies can be confirmed in larger population studies, and allowing for shortening of the time needed to activate the healing process, the PDT-RLP068 system could offer the chance to improve care for DFI patients without compromising the sustainability of the system.