Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) glycoforms change as pregnancy progresses. We have developed an antibody (B152) which can measure a hyperglycosylated early pregnancy isoform of hCG. This putative hyperglycosylated form of hCG arises very early in pregnancies and is rapidly replaced by an isoform that predominates for the remainder of the pregnancy. The profiles of these hCG glycoforms are measured as a ratio of values of two immunometric assays. The profiles of these ratios differ between pregnancies which persist and those which will experience early failure.In this report, daily urine hCG isoform ratios from donor eggs (no exogenous hCG pretreatment), in vitro fertilization pregnancies were profiled and analyzed from the first day following embryo transfer (ET). Significant differences were found between continuing pregnancy and pregnancy loss throughout days 5-20 post-ET. When hCG isoform ratios were analyzed from the first day of detectable hCG, pregnancy loss could be predicted in the case of a single fetus both during the 5-to 10-day time segment (P=0·018) and the 10-to 15-day time segment (P=0·045). When single and multiple fetus pregnancies were analyzed together significance was approached in the 10-to 15-day time period (P=0·058).In a second population of pregnant women who conceived naturally, in whom urine samples were collected at approximately weekly intervals to either term birth or clinical spontaneous abortion, the ratio could discriminate between miscarriages and normal term pregnancies (P=0·043). In later pregnancy, the ratio of hCG isoforms declined more rapidly in miscarriages than in term pregnancy.Antibody B152 was produced using a choriocarcinomaderived hCG (C5), which was hyperglycosylated at both N-and O-linked sites and was 100% nicked at position [47][48] . Western blot analyses supported the assay results showing that early pregnancy urine does not contain nicked C5-like hCG. Also, the early pregnancy hCG appeared to be the same size as later pregnancy hCG as judged by SDS gel electrophoresis. A series of Western blot analyses and immunoassays conducted with the samples either non-reduced or reduced showed that B152 is directed to a linear epitope located in the COOHterminal peptide region of the subunit. This indicated that only the O-glycan groups and not the N-linked glycans are part of the antibody epitope.

The association of current smoking with FSH may reflect accelerated oocyte atresia, impaired follicle quality or dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis. Identification of the causal mechanism has implications for prevention or treatment of conception delay, infertility and morbidity associated with early menopause.

Although our data do not support our hypothesis, they leave open the possibility that changes in follicular development unrelated to the size of the oocyte pool influence abnormal chromosome segregation.

Gene-environment interactions are hypothesized to be major contributors to susceptibility to environmental carcinogens and interindividual variability in cancer risk. We present findings on associations between genetic susceptibility due to inherited polymorphisms of the Phase II detoxification enzyme sulfotransferase 1A1 (SULT1A1), breast cancer risk, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-DNA adducts. A hospital based case-control study was conducted at the New York-Presbyterian Medical Center (NYPMC). The study utilized two control groups: one comprised of women with benign breast disease (BBD) and the other comprised of women visiting NYPMC for routine gynecologic checkups (healthy controls). Blood samples were collected from cases and controls; and breast tissue from pathology blocks was collected from cases (tumor and non-tumor tissue) and BBD controls (benign tissue). PAH-DNA adduct levels were measured by immunohistochemistry in breast tissue samples, and the SULT1A1 (Arg/His) polymorphism at codon 213 was determined by PCR RFLP analyses using DNA from white blood cells. Increasing number of His alleles was modestly associated with breast cancer case-control status, when cases were compared to healthy controls (p for trend = 0.08), when cases were compared to BBD controls (p for trend = 0.08) and when cases were compared to both control groups combined (p for trend = 0.07). Contrary to our hypothesis PAH-DNA adduct levels in breast tissue were not associated with SULT1A1 genotype. Our findings are consistent with a prior report that the Arg/His polymorphism in SULT1A1 is associated with breast cancer risk.

We review our studies on the role of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-DNA adducts in breast cancer. Additionally we report on analyses of the reliability of the scoring procedures used with immunohistochemical assay for PAH-DNA adducts and of potential bias arising from the use of benign breast disease (BBD) controls. We conducted a case-control study utilizing two control groups: BBD controls who donated tissue and blood samples, and healthy controls who donated blood samples. In comparisons of tumor tissue from cases and benign tissue from BBD controls, increasing adduct levels were significantly associated with case-control status [odds ratio (OR) ϭ 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18 -4.92], whereas in comparisons of nontumor tissue from cases and benign tissue from BBD controls the association was nonsignificant (OR ϭ 1.97, 95% CI 0.94 -4.17). We also show among cases, but not among BBD controls, that the GSTM1 null genotype is associated with increased adduct levels in breast tissue. Our reliability study found the scoring procedures used with the immunohistochemical assay to have high reliability, 0.93 in nontumor, 0.82 in tumor, and 0.74 in benign tissues. However, we found that the technician significantly contributed to the total variability of a series of data. Finally, we did not find a consistent bias to the null associated with the use of BBD controls; however, BBD controls may overestimate the prevalence of family history of breast cancer compared to that of healthy controls (18% vs.14%). We hypothesize that the higher prevalence results from a referral bias and discuss how this may influence our results.