No abstract

A retrospective study was performed of 161 patients who had undergone arthroscopic operation for chondromalacia of the knee joint. After an average follow-up period of 40 (range 10-72) months, patients with severe articular cartilage lesions who had undergone articular lavage alone showed significantly poorer results (P < 0.001). With the same stage of chondromalacia and having undergone the same surgical procedure, younger patients showed better results than older patients. The more effective interruption of the circulus vitiosus during the development of degenerative joint diseases is the primary cause for better results achieved by mechanical debridement of the joint for patients suffering from grade 2 or higher. According to the literature, aggressive subchondral abrasion in severely degenerated knees does not show any benefits. Apparently, the success of the therapy depends to a great extent on the inferiority of the potential degenerative regenerate (lack of capacity of intrinsic regeneration of the hyaline cartilage) as well as on the grade and the progression of chondromalacia. Almost every second patient suffering from grade 4 chondromalacia complained of recurrent pain 1 year postoperatively. One of every 6 patients received a knee joint prosthesis within the 1st year. Therefore, the patients' preoperative expectations have to be clearly objectified. The surgical procedure as an operation with a low complication risk can also be justified as a temporary alternative to total knee arthroplasty in patients suffering from a high-grade degeneration of the joint.

Generally, Robodoc-assisted surgery may be performed in all uncemented total hip arthroplasties. The individual indication should be checked because of the increased effort of surgery, the advantages and disadvantages, and the non-proven better long-term results in comparison to the regular technique. It seems that the Robodoc system provides advantages in post-traumatic arthritis and deformities of the proximal femur (varus and valgus neck) on account of the computer-aided preoperative planning and correct operative realization.

The ROBODOC system has to be critically considered as an alternative to hand implantation. In our opinion, it should be used only under certain circumstances considering the current technical progress. Only in these cases the potential of the system can be used beneficially.