According to the present view, metastasis marks the end in a sequence of genomic changes underlying the progression of an epithelial cell to a lethal cancer. Here, we aimed to find out at what stage of tumor development transformed cells leave the primary tumor and whether a defined genotype corresponds to metastatic disease. To this end, we isolated single disseminated cancer cells from bone marrow of breast cancer patients and performed singlecell comparative genomic hybridization. We analyzed disseminated tumor cells from patients after curative resection of the primary tumor (stage M0), as presumptive progenitors of manifest metastasis, and from patients with manifest metastasis (stage M1). Their genomic data were compared with those from microdissected areas of matched primary tumors. Disseminated cells from M0-stage patients displayed significantly fewer chromosomal aberrations than primary tumors or cells from M1-stage patients (P < 0.008 and P < 0.0001, respectively), and their aberrations appeared to be randomly generated. In contrast, primary tumors and M1 cells harbored different and characteristic chromosomal imbalances. Moreover, applying machine-learning methods for the classification of the genotypes, we could correctly identify the presence or absence of metastatic disease in a patient on the basis of a single-cell genome. We suggest that in breast cancer, tumor cells may disseminate in a far less progressed genomic state than previously thought, and that they acquire genomic aberrations typical of metastatic cells thereafter. Thus, our data challenge the widely held view that the precursors of metastasis are derived from the most advanced clone within the primary tumor.T he prevailing paradigm of carcinogenesis suggests that epithelial cells sequentially accumulate multiple genetic and epigenetic changes underlying the disorganization of tissue morphology and uncontrolled growth (1). The model predicts that certain additional genomic events initiate invasiveness of the tumor and subsequently progression to metastasis. However, this hypothesis of an ''additional event'' initiating metastasis relatively late in tumorigenesis was recently challenged by another model based on global gene expression analysis of primary breast cancers in which groups of genes were identified that predicted the development of distant metastasis (2). Thus it was concluded that the proclivity to metastasize is acquired early during multistep tumorigenesis, although it manifests only much later after mutation of other genes (3).A closer analysis of the natural course of breast cancer reveals several inconsistencies with both models. Why, after curative resection of a primary tumor and its regional lymph nodes, does it often take years or decades until clinical metastases appear? It is difficult to understand how a cell that has been selected at the primary site for acquisition of self-sufficiency in growth signals, unlimited proliferative potential, sustained angiogenesis, and unresponsiveness to growth inhibitory signals...

Introduction Lymphocyte infiltration (LI) is often seen in breast cancer but its importance remains controversial. A positive correlation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification and LI has been described, which was associated with a more favorable outcome. However, specific lymphocytes might also promote tumor progression by shifting the cytokine milieu in the tumor.

IntroductionCurrent prognostic gene expression profiles for breast cancer mainly reflect proliferation status and are most useful in ER-positive cancers. Triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) are clinically heterogeneous and prognostic markers and biology-based therapies are needed to better treat this disease.MethodsWe assembled Affymetrix gene expression data for 579 TNBC and performed unsupervised analysis to define metagenes that distinguish molecular subsets within TNBC. We used n = 394 cases for discovery and n = 185 cases for validation. Sixteen metagenes emerged that identified basal-like, apocrine and claudin-low molecular subtypes, or reflected various non-neoplastic cell populations, including immune cells, blood, adipocytes, stroma, angiogenesis and inflammation within the cancer. The expressions of these metagenes were correlated with survival and multivariate analysis was performed, including routine clinical and pathological variables.ResultsSeventy-three percent of TNBC displayed basal-like molecular subtype that correlated with high histological grade and younger age. Survival of basal-like TNBC was not different from non basal-like TNBC. High expression of immune cell metagenes was associated with good and high expression of inflammation and angiogenesis-related metagenes were associated with poor prognosis. A ratio of high B-cell and low IL-8 metagenes identified 32% of TNBC with good prognosis (hazard ratio (HR) 0.37, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.61; P < 0.001) and was the only significant predictor in multivariate analysis including routine clinicopathological variables.ConclusionsWe describe a ratio of high B-cell presence and low IL-8 activity as a powerful new prognostic marker for TNBC. Inhibition of the IL-8 pathway also represents an attractive novel therapeutic target for this disease.

No abstract

The retinoblastoma protein (pRB), p16, and cyclin D1 are major components of the RB pathway, which controls the G1 checkpoint of the cell cycle. Proper regulation of this pathway is crucial for normal cell proliferation. Abnormal forms of these proteins have been found in various types of malignant tumours. In the present report, immunohistochemical techniques were applied to study the expression of pRB, p16, and cyclin D1 in 161 samples of primary small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 20 samples of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While pRB and cyclin D1 staining was negative in 161 specimens of SCLC, expression of p16 was observed in 153 samples. In contrast to SCLC, 16 out of 20 NSCLC cases exhibited pRB expression and 15 showed cyclin D1 expression, but only very weak p16 staining was found in five samples. These observations could provide additional criteria for the distinction between SCLC and NSCLC. Furthermore, these findings, based on primary tissues, implicate different mechanisms in the tumourigenesis of SCLC and NSCLC. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.