Very rare pediatric tumors (VRTs) pose a challenge for treating physicians as little is known about the best diagnostic assessment and therapeutic decision-making in these malignancies. A large proportion of these cancers occur in adolescence. Therefore, the established structures of pediatric oncology including cancer registration may partly be circumvented. This may lead to an underregistration in clinical cancer registries of yet unclear extent. The aim of this study is to increase the knowledge on the occurrence of VRTs in pediatric patients in Germany. Pseudonymized data of cases recorded in the Bavarian Cancer Registry (BCR) between 2002 and 2014 were retrieved. VRTs according to the definition of the European Cooperative Study Group for Pediatric Rare Tumors were identified using the ICD and ICD-O classification. The numbers of registered patients were compared to those reported to the German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR). 6.3% (n = 290) of all malignancies (n = 4615) in the age below 18 years were classified as VRTs. Median age at diagnosis was 15 years (range 0–17 years). The most common tumor types included malignant melanoma, skin carcinoma, and gonadal tumors. During the same period, 49 pediatric patients from Bavaria with matchable VRTs were reported to the GCCR, accounting for 17% of cases reported to the BCR.Conclusions: The frequency of VRTs in Germany is underestimated in the national GCCR. With this study, we present population-based data on the incidence of VRTs in Germany for the first time. In order to gain additional knowledge about these malignancies, registration of VRTs must be improved through enhanced data exchange between the GCCR, the public cancer registries, and the clinical Registry for Rare Pediatric Tumors (STEP). What is Known:• Rare pediatric tumors pose a challenge for treating physicians as limited knowledge is available on these malignancies for diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making.• Little is known about the frequency of these rare tumors in pediatric patients. What is New:• The frequency of rare pediatric tumors in Germany is distinctly underestimated in the German Childhood Cancer Registry.• We present population-based data on the incidence of these rare pediatric cancers for the first time.
Background While during the COVID-19 pandemic the number of patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) decreased, no change in patient or system delay could be shown due to local lockdown (LD) policy. Not much is known about the influence of LD on procedural details and intrahospital outcome of these patients. Methods Data was obtained from 511 patients treated for acute STEMI (24hours from symptom onset) from January 2019 to March 8th 2021 at two primary PCI (pPCI) centers in Germany. Patients presenting as intra-hospital STEMI, patients showing no culprit lesion and patients undergoing direct CABG were excluded. Overall, 456 patients (74% male, mean age 64±12) were included. These patients were divided into two groups: complete lockdown (LD; n=58; March 21st–April 20th 2020 and December 16th 2020–March 7th 2021) and no complete lockdown (No-LD; n=398)). Results There were no differences in pre-hospital care between the groups: Telemedicine (LD 23.5% vs. No-LD 34.9%; p=0.11), pre-alarm of the cath-lab staff (LD 59.6% vs. 66.6%, p=0.32) and direct admission to the cath-lab (LD 44.8% vs. No-LD 49.8%, p=0.58) were performed as often as in No-LD times. Neither the pain to first medical contact (LD 188±272 Min vs. No-LD 236±317 Min, p=0.29) nor the door to balloon time (55±54 Min vs. No-LD 49±58 Min, p=0.470) as well as other periods showed any difference. All over cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR; LD 19.0% vs. No-LD 14.3%, p=0.35) or presentation with cardiogenic shock (25.9% vs 23.9%, p=0.74) was equally presented in both groups. However, left ventricular assist devices were implanted more often during LD (6.9% vs. No-LD 1.8%; p=0.017). Primary radial access was performed in the majority of the cases (LD 60.3% vs. No-LD 58.8%, p=0.82). During LD the culprit lesion was RCA in most cases (46.6% vs. No-LD LAD 46.7%, p=0.341). Stent thrombosis was not more common in out-of-hospital STEMI patients during LD (6.9% vs. 8.0%, p=0.76). Thrombus aspiration was performed in 10.3% during lockdown (vs. No-LD 4.5%, p=0.06), GP-IIb-IIIa inhibitors were not administered more often (LD 19.0% vs. No-LD 19.4%, p=0.92) and no reflow phenomenon was not seen more frequent (LD 20.7% vs. No-LD 21.3% p=0.91). TIMI III flow could be established in the majority of the cases (LD 86.0% vs. No-LD 91.5%, p=0.20). During further hospital stay, neither the frequency of ventilator (LD 17.2% vs. No-LD 17.0%, p=0.98) nor vasopressor use (LD 20.7% vs. No-LD 20.1% p=0.925) differed. Left ventricular function (47±13% vs. No-LD 45±12%; p=0.34) and maximum creatinkinase (LD 1827±1687 U/l vs. No-LD: 2292±4100 U/l, p=0.40) showed no difference between the groups as did intrahospital death (LD 10.3% vs. No-LD 11.6%, p=0.79). Conclusion Despite the known decline in STEMI patients during LD periods, patient care, procedural details and inta-hospital outcome of the ones presenting to a pPCI hospital do not change during LD periods. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.