To evaluate the usefulness of chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer, objective response, length of remission and survival have been considered the main yardsticks. Subjective improvement and gain in Karnofsky performance status have attracted very little attention. Thirty-one patients with stages III and IV underwent combination chemotherapy with high-dose cisplatin, and were assessed with categorical scales and 100 mm visual analogue scales used by patients themselves to report on several symptoms of their illness. After chemotherapy 17 of 19 patients (89%) gained weight; 20 presented anorexia, 10 of those (50%) improved; 15 had pain, 7 of those (47%) were alleviated; cough was reported in 22, in 10 (45%) it was ameliorated; hemoptysis disappeared in 10 of 11 patients (91%); of the 9 patients who had dyspnea, 7 improved (78%); and astenia was attenuated in 8 of 16 patients (50%). Quality of life was reported improved in 75% of those patients who had considered themselves seriously affected prior to the treatment. When compared with Karnofsky performance status, no relationship was found (r = 0.31). It is concluded that, apart from the objective response achieved, a significant proportion of patients did benefit from treatment as demonstrated by a marked relief of symptoms.
The current trial was carried out to assess the survival enhancement achieved, if any, by adding ifosfamide to vindesine and cisplatin (IVP) in contrast to mitomycin plus vindesine and cisplatin (MVP). Between June 1986 and September 1988, 110 patients were randomly allocated to receive either ifosfamide (3 g/m2 plus 3 g/m2 of mesna) or mitomycin 8 mg/m2, on days 1, 29, and 71 only. In both arms vindesine was given 3 mg/m2 weekly X 5 then every 2 weeks. In the MVP arm, 120 mg/m2 of cisplatin was administered on days 1 and 29 and then every 6 weeks, whereas in the IVP arm 100 mg/m2 of cisplatin was given on the same time schedule. One hundred three patients were evaluable for response and toxicity and 56% of patients had Mountain's Stage IV disease. The response rate was 26% (14/53 patients) in the MVP arm (95% confidence interval, 14%-39%) and 20% (ten of 50 patients) in the IVP arm (95% confidence interval, 10%-34%). Neither the response rate nor the median survival times were significantly different, although more nephrotoxicity was produced in the MVP arm, grade 1+ in 43% versus 26% in IVP arm (P = 0.04). Results obtained from this study fail to demonstrate that mitomycin or ifosfamide have a synergistic effect on the efficacy of the vindesine/cisplatin combination.
Twenty-three patients with marginally resectable and unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (stages IIIA and IIIB) were treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients received three cycles of preoperative chemotherapy with two alkylating agents, cyclophosphamide 2.5 g/m2 intravenously (i.v.) and ifosfamide 3.5 g/m2 i.v., mesna 12 g/m2 was given additionally to prevent drug hematuria. Six of 23 patients (26%) had partial response. Of the seven patients who underwent thoracotomy, two were completely resected, but with macroscopic residual disease. Mean time to progression for the whole group was 7 months. Fifteen patients had progression of disease, with local metastases only in six, and distant metastases in eight. After administering 52 chemotherapy cycles, cyclophosphamide-ifosfamide doses were cut down, as eight of 16 patients required hospitalization for fever during neutropenia nadirs. This two-alkylating (non-cisplatin) regimen, unlike cisplatin-based regimens, was ineffective, and further trials are not recommended.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.