2014
DOI: 10.1051/cocv/2014005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

𝒞1regularity for Dirichlet problems associated to fully nonlinear degenerate elliptic equations

Abstract: We prove Hölder regularity of the gradient, up to the boundary for solutions of some fully-nonlinear, degenerate elliptic equations, with degeneracy coming from the gradient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The case α < 0. As proved in [7], if α < 0 a sub solution u and super solution v of equation (2.1) satisfy respectively in the viscosity sense…”
Section: A Priori Lipschitz-type Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The case α < 0. As proved in [7], if α < 0 a sub solution u and super solution v of equation (2.1) satisfy respectively in the viscosity sense…”
Section: A Priori Lipschitz-type Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For Dirichlet boundary data, the regularity up to the boundary is fairly well understood. To know, Berindelli and Demengel [7] proved C 1,α (Ω) estimates in the presence of a regular boundary datum. However, for the Neumann problem, there are still not many results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7) for universal constant µ > 0, M F > 0 and C. Then applying (3.7) to translations of u we obtain a C α modulus of continuity for u at the bottom ϒ by a standard iterative argument. Then, (3.6) follows by interior regularity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further question we ask is : does the C 1 or C 1,β regularity holds, as in the case of the classical pLaplacian, [18], [12]? A first step would consist in proving the C 1 regularity when the right hand side is zero and then deduce from it the case f = 0 by methods as in [15], [3], but even in the case f ≡ 0 i have no intuition about the truthfullness of this result. The usual methods in the theory of viscosity solutions, ( [8], [17]), cannot directly be applied to the present case, one of the key argument of their proofs being the uniform ellipticity of the operator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%