2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-019-4144-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

切割机在切割块石时的性能评估

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are no specific relationships to determine these parameters, based on previous studies and experts' opinions, a range was determined for each of them, such as the number of grasshopper populations (5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40) and the number of iterations (10, 20, 40, 50, and 100). Then, the most appropriate ones were selected by a trial-and-error approach [107].…”
Section: Goa-svm Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there are no specific relationships to determine these parameters, based on previous studies and experts' opinions, a range was determined for each of them, such as the number of grasshopper populations (5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40) and the number of iterations (10, 20, 40, 50, and 100). Then, the most appropriate ones were selected by a trial-and-error approach [107].…”
Section: Goa-svm Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no specific method for determining the amount of k-fold, and it is determined according to the number of data and the opinion of experts. Hence, k-fold was considered to be equal to 3 in this study [107]. In addition, the three different types of kernel functions, including RBF, POL, and LIN, were used.…”
Section: Goa-svm Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing Accuracy (%) 1 0. After constructing different models and determining the accuracy performance of each model, all models were ranked based on a simple ranking method suggested by Zorlu et al, (2008) and Table 4 indicates the ranking results [103]. According to Table 4, all models were ranked and the seven developed models had the lowest rank with a rank equal to 31 among 25 developed models.…”
Section: Sp Mnl Mnnl Training Accuracy (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Akhyani et al [26] predicted the circular diamond saw wear by combining the fuzzy rock engineering system (Fuzzy RES) and genetic algorithm (GA). Ataei et al [27] evaluated the energy consumption and vibration of cutting machine by incorporating a combination of multi-layered perceptron ANN and genetic algorithm (GANN-BP) and the support vector regression method and Cuckoo optimization algorithm (COA-SVR). Hosseini et al [28] investigated the effect of cooling and lubricant fluid on the cutting performance (as a maximum electrical current) with ANN and the hybrid genetic algorithmartificial neural networks (hybrid GA-ANN).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%