DÉBATS SCIENTIFIQUES ET ORIENTATIONS PROSPECTIVES DU DÉVELOPPEMENT SCIENTIFIQUE - Volume 1 2021
DOI: 10.36074/logos-01.10.2021.v1.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Устойчивость И Развитие В Переходный Период

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimizing the course of change involves taking into account changes not only at the micro, but also at the macro level [1][2][3][4][5]. Thus, the feature that determines the range of both emerging strategic transformations and the impact on them is the transition: from the economy of simple labor to the economy of unique creativity; from exogenous quantitative growth to endogenous qualitative development; from the dominant of the material to the spiritual, moral and intellectual; from formational to non-formational; from exchange based on the comparison of goods to exchange based on the comparison of abilities; from conceptual openness to recognition of the right to intrinsic value and isolation of cultural and civilizational worlds; from cosmopolitanism / nationalism to regionalism and strategic partnership; from the unity of globalism patterns to post-global diversity [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimizing the course of change involves taking into account changes not only at the micro, but also at the macro level [1][2][3][4][5]. Thus, the feature that determines the range of both emerging strategic transformations and the impact on them is the transition: from the economy of simple labor to the economy of unique creativity; from exogenous quantitative growth to endogenous qualitative development; from the dominant of the material to the spiritual, moral and intellectual; from formational to non-formational; from exchange based on the comparison of goods to exchange based on the comparison of abilities; from conceptual openness to recognition of the right to intrinsic value and isolation of cultural and civilizational worlds; from cosmopolitanism / nationalism to regionalism and strategic partnership; from the unity of globalism patterns to post-global diversity [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%