2019
DOI: 10.14258/abs.v5.i2.6193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Новые данные по систематике и фауне Dolichopus subpennatus D'Assis Fonseca, 1976 и Dolichopus pennatus Meigen, 1824 (Dolichopodidae, Diptera)

Abstract: Приводится дифференциальный диагноз между Dolichopus subpennatus и Dolichopus pennatus.  Морфология гипопигия Dolichopus pennatus и Dolichopus subpennatus изучена впервые. Выделяются новые признаки по строению вентральных метаэпистерн, метанотума и морфологии гипопигия. Форма 3-го членика усиков не может быть использована для различения видов, ввиду внутривидовой изменчивости. Приводятся данные по фауне Dolichopus pennatus и Dolichopus subpennatus. Dolichopus pennatus впервые указывается Архангельской и Свердл… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…REFERENCES. Stackelberg, 1918, 2153(Borovichskiy dist., 25.06 -18.07.1917; Selivanova et al 2019: 113 (Veliky Novgorod env., 22.06.1975.…”
Section: Dolichopus Pennatus Meigen 1824mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…REFERENCES. Stackelberg, 1918, 2153(Borovichskiy dist., 25.06 -18.07.1917; Selivanova et al 2019: 113 (Veliky Novgorod env., 22.06.1975.…”
Section: Dolichopus Pennatus Meigen 1824mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hairs located only at the lower edge of the scutellum and bare metanotum are characterized for both sexes of D. subpennatus . However, the further morphological analysis of specimens from Urals and Western Siberia showed that the characters is variable and cannot be used in the species diagnosis of females [Selivanova et al, 2019]. In addition, the species can be distinguished from each other by the shape of the apicoventral epandrial lobe [Selivanova et al, 2019].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the further morphological analysis of specimens from Urals and Western Siberia showed that the characters is variable and cannot be used in the species diagnosis of females [Selivanova et al, 2019]. In addition, the species can be distinguished from each other by the shape of the apicoventral epandrial lobe [Selivanova et al, 2019]. The use of the listed characters requires experienced entomologists for correct identification or availability of collection material for comparison, therefore, the diagnosis of these species is most often carried out according to the modified middle legs of males.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These and some other works (Mashnina 1960 for Belorussian Polesye; Stackelberg 1962 for Vitebsk Region; Sushko 2017 for raised bogs of North Belorussian Poozyorye) did not contain label data for the species. Where possible, I have extracted locality data for species from published papers (Arnold 1901;Bańkowska 1995;Maslova et al 2010;Negrobov, Rodionova 2004;Selivanova et al 2019) and unpublished dissertations of , Maslova (2006), Selivanova (2006) and Nechai (2011). The latter were PhD students of Prof. O. P. Negrobov; therefore, their species identifications were most probably verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%