2017
DOI: 10.3945/jn.116.242354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ω-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation Does Not Affect Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, there have been two meta-analyses so far to assess the effects of supplementation of omega 3 fatty acids in ASD patient. 23 , 24 The first meta-analysis, which included only two clinical trials with a very small total sample size (n=40), failed to show any benefits of supplementation of omega 3 fatty acids compared to placebo. 23 A more recent meta-analysis by Horvath et al, 24 which included more clinical trials, demonstrated no significant positive impact of supplementation of omega 3 fatty acids on most subscales of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), despite an improved lethargy subscale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, there have been two meta-analyses so far to assess the effects of supplementation of omega 3 fatty acids in ASD patient. 23 , 24 The first meta-analysis, which included only two clinical trials with a very small total sample size (n=40), failed to show any benefits of supplementation of omega 3 fatty acids compared to placebo. 23 A more recent meta-analysis by Horvath et al, 24 which included more clinical trials, demonstrated no significant positive impact of supplementation of omega 3 fatty acids on most subscales of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), despite an improved lethargy subscale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPA and DHA are of fundamental importance for brain structure and function because they are orthomolecules and their functional sites are exclusively cell membranes ( 92 ). Therefore, DHA and EPA have been studied for the treatment of multiple neurodevelopmental disorders, including ASD ( 93 , 94 ), ADHD ( 95 , 96 ), schizophrenia ( 97 ), and mood disorders ( 98 , 99 ). Also, reduced concentrations of omega-3 fatty acids have been observed in children with ASD ( 10 , 100 ), suggesting omega-3 fatty acids supplementation may be of help for the treatment of symptoms associated with ASD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the six included RCTs, five showed that omega-3 fatty acid supplementation does not affect core symptoms of ASD in overall measures, and the only study that reported the most significant results was clearly limited in sample size ( 105 ). Besides, a recent meta-analysis of five RCTs have assessed the association, and results from their quantitative analyses indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in ASD symptoms between groups measured by validated scales ( 93 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous systematic reviews on PUFAs for children and adolescents with ASD included respectively two RCTs [64], four RCTs [65], and five RCTs [66] concluding that there was no evidence of effect [64,66] or that PUFAs could potentially improve some ASD symptoms [65]. The differences between our findings and the one of the meta-analysis of RCTs by Mazahery et al [65], especially when considering the efficacy of PUFAs on communication outcome they found (4 RCTs; MD -1.96, 95% CI − 3.57 to − 0.34), could be partially due to the different methods used: the authors performed their analyses extracting the mean change and SD of change from baseline to endpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we used the Standardized Mean Difference to pool data from assessed through different scales, while Mazahery et al extracted only data regarding ABC subscales. Horvath et al [66] performed different meta-analyses for each instrument used to assessed the outcomes of interest; they found PUFAs to be efficacious in improving lethargy-social withdrawal (2 RCTs; MD 1.98, 95% CI 0.32 to 3.63) when assessed with the ABC, and daily-living (1 RCT; MD 6.2, 95% CI 0.37 to 12.03) as assessed by VABS. Also, the authors found the PUFAs to worsen externalizing behavior (2 RCTs; MD -6.22, 95% CI − 10.9 to − 1.59) and social skills (1 RCT; MD -7.0, 95% CI − 13.62 to − 0.38) as assessed through BASC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%