2011
DOI: 10.1080/00958972.2011.572968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

π–π Stacking, hydrogen bonding and anti-ferromagnetic coupling mechanism on a mononuclear Cu(II) complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed H-bonding and π-π stacking in the molecule played a vital role in governing the architecture of the structure by generating hydrogen-bonded dimers. As expected, the H-bonding and π-π stacking plays a crucial role in structure modification [13,14,[59][60][61][62][63]. The presence of methanol in the structure does not show any disorder in the crystal structure, probably due to its coordination in the crystal lattice only.…”
Section: Crystal Structure Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The observed H-bonding and π-π stacking in the molecule played a vital role in governing the architecture of the structure by generating hydrogen-bonded dimers. As expected, the H-bonding and π-π stacking plays a crucial role in structure modification [13,14,[59][60][61][62][63]. The presence of methanol in the structure does not show any disorder in the crystal structure, probably due to its coordination in the crystal lattice only.…”
Section: Crystal Structure Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Thus, if we include the presence of a weak intermolecular coupling with the mean field approximation ( zJ ), we can replicate even better the magnetic properties of compound 1 with g = 1.959, zJ = −0.03 cm –1 , and | D | = 1.23 cm –1 with a residual of 0.0158 (solid line in Figure ). As expected, the interaction between the Mn­(III) centers is weak and antiferromagnetic, since usually π ··· π interactions give rise to weak couplings. On the other side, the D value found for the isolated Mn­(III) center is quite low and is in the typical range observed (−3.8 cm –1 to +3.1 cm –1 ) for mononuclear Mn­(III) ions …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%