Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1962
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5582(62)90230-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

μ−-mesic atomic processes in gaseous hydrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the D-H µ system the present low-energy muon transfer rate of 133×10 8 s −1 is in agreement with both experiments [13,14]. The present rate is slightly smaller than the theoretical studies of Refs.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the D-H µ system the present low-energy muon transfer rate of 133×10 8 s −1 is in agreement with both experiments [13,14]. The present rate is slightly smaller than the theoretical studies of Refs.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…with σ tr being the transfer cross section, v the relative velocity of the incident particles and N 0 = 4.25 × 10 22 cm −3 the liquid hydrogen density, are listed in Table I together with recent theoretical calculations. One can see differences between different experimental data [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and theoretical results [20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are in fair agreement with those measured at comparable experimental conditions i.e. with liquid hydrogen during the sixties [2][3][4]. The rate Apa however differs from the value which is generally accepted for room temperature [5], (1.68 4-0.26).…”
Section: ?supporting
confidence: 86%
“…We compare our results with some of this data. Table I shows cross sections, σ tr , and corresponding thermal rates, λ tr , for all three muon transfer reactions at low collision energies together with some theoretical calculations from older papers [36][37][38]43] and with some experimental data from works [52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. Our FH-type equation results shown in Table I have been computed within the 2×(1s+2s+2p) approximation in the expansion ( 23) for both Faddeev-type components.Therefore, it was actually used with up to six expansion functions.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%