1997
DOI: 10.1002/anie.199700701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[(η5‐C5Me5)AlFe(CO)4]—Synthesis, Structure, and Bonding

Abstract: crystal of dimensions 0.37 x 0.37 x 0.27 mm, rhombohedral. R3, a = b = 15.0677(7), c = 48.7214(49) A, 1 = = 1 102 g~m -~, 2 = 6, j~ = 12.22 cm-', 2328 independent reflections, R(Rw) = 0.105(0.103) for 1309 [I > 20(1)] observed reflections. Maximum final difference Fourier peak 0.83 e k ' . Seifert XRD3000-S, four-circle diffractometer, Cu,, radiation, graphite monochromator, 4 2 0 scan, Om,, = 60". Two set of data were collected due to the instability of the crystal, and although the present set was recorded m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

6
83
2
8

Year Published

1998
1998
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
83
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…[8] In contrast to CO, the ER fragments almost exclusively occupy bridging positions between two metal atoms in the known derivatives. A single case of terminal coordination was recently reported by Fischer et al in [(CO) 4 Fe(AlCp*)], [9] for which significant p backbonding from the metal atom to the ligand was calculated. Up to now, analogues of mononuclear, binary carbonyl complexes with exclusively terminal ER groups were unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[8] In contrast to CO, the ER fragments almost exclusively occupy bridging positions between two metal atoms in the known derivatives. A single case of terminal coordination was recently reported by Fischer et al in [(CO) 4 Fe(AlCp*)], [9] for which significant p backbonding from the metal atom to the ligand was calculated. Up to now, analogues of mononuclear, binary carbonyl complexes with exclusively terminal ER groups were unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The extent of the p backbonding in 2, indicated by the very short Ni ± In bonds, is uncertain. Theoretical investigations confirm such interactions in [Fe(CO) 4 (AlCp*)], [9] in which, however, the contributing orbitals on the aluminum atoms are partially occupied by the cyclopentadienyl ligands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The bonding in 5 is similar to that in the homologous aluminum compound; [17] the boron atom possesses the formal oxidation number 1 and functions as a weak p acceptor. The chemical shift d( 11 B) À 35.3 lies in the range typical of apical 11 B nuclei in nido-carboranes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Gruppe die Vermutung, dass diese Verbindungen als Liganden in der ‹bergangsmetallchemie πwahrscheinlich einen immensen Einflu˚darauf haben, wie man k¸nftig neue Metall-MetallBindungen herstellt º und wir in der Zukunft zweifellos Zeugen der Herstellung vieler neuer Clustertypen sein werden.™ [1] [2] und [Ni(GaCp*) 4 ] [3] (Cp* ¼ Pentamethylcylopentadienid) legten diese Perspektive nahe. Bis dahin waren nicht zuletzt infolge unserer Arbeit¸ber [(CO) 4 Fe(AlCp*)] [4] haupts‰chlich Komplexe dieser neuen, zu CO isolobalen Liganden ER (E ¼ Al, Ga, In; R ¼ Alkyl, Aryl) an Carbonylmetall-Fragmenten [(CO) n M a ] untersucht worden. [5,6] Konstitution und strukturelle Charakteristika der neuen [Cp*Ga]-substituierten Ni 4 -und Rh 6 -Carbonylcluster von Jutzi et al [3,7] oder der Komplex [{(CpNi)(m-AlCp*)} 2 ] von Schnˆckel et al [8] 4 ] mit bindenden PdPd-Abst‰nden von 2.75±2.77 ä zeigt.…”
unclassified