2017
DOI: 10.1503/jpn.150363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol decreases willingness to exert cognitive effort in male rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(63 reference statements)
3
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These data emphasise that not all forms of cannabinoid receptor activation produce converging effects, and animal studies aiming to model the psychoactive effects of cannabis would do well to administer THC in lieu of its synthetic counterparts. In contrast, modulating endogenous cannabinoid tone, via CB 1 receptor inverse agonism, or by inhibition of endogenous anandamide hydrolysis by FAAH, did not affect choice on the rCET (Silveira et al, 2016). Taken together with the null effects of CB 1 antagonism reported with the delay and physical effort tasks, it appears that endocannabinoid signalling does not tonically regulate decision-making, at least under non-pathological conditions (Khani et al, 2015; Pattij et al, 2007; Wiskerke et al, 2011).…”
Section: Cannabinoid Modulation Of Prefrontal Cortical Function: Fmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These data emphasise that not all forms of cannabinoid receptor activation produce converging effects, and animal studies aiming to model the psychoactive effects of cannabis would do well to administer THC in lieu of its synthetic counterparts. In contrast, modulating endogenous cannabinoid tone, via CB 1 receptor inverse agonism, or by inhibition of endogenous anandamide hydrolysis by FAAH, did not affect choice on the rCET (Silveira et al, 2016). Taken together with the null effects of CB 1 antagonism reported with the delay and physical effort tasks, it appears that endocannabinoid signalling does not tonically regulate decision-making, at least under non-pathological conditions (Khani et al, 2015; Pattij et al, 2007; Wiskerke et al, 2011).…”
Section: Cannabinoid Modulation Of Prefrontal Cortical Function: Fmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…THC administration dose-dependently decreased choice of the difficult, high-reward option requiring accurate detection of a brief (0.2 s) light stimulus amid a five-hole array; correspondingly, rats shifted choice to the easier, low-reward option where the light stimulus was presented for a longer duration (1 s) (Silveira et al, 2016). Importantly, the lack of effect of THC on attentional accuracy suggests that the choice shift was not due to an inability to complete high-reward trials.…”
Section: Cannabinoid Modulation Of Prefrontal Cortical Function: Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, other aspects of learning and memory, such as cognitive effort, appear to be compromised following adult THC administration (Silveira et al 2017). Collectively, these findings indicate that adult cognitive functioning is disrupted following exposure to a CB1 agonist, however, less is known about the cognitive consequences following adolescent exposure to a CB1 agonist.…”
Section: Marijuanamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Cannabis causes many psychotropic effects, mainly mediated by D 9 -THC agonism of CB1 [44], which makes it unlikely to be used in natura. On the other hand, experimental studies have demonstrated several therapeutic properties of isolated cannabinoids in a number of in vitro and in vivo models [45].…”
Section: Therapeutic Uses and Mechanisms Of Action Of Cbdmentioning
confidence: 99%