2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

γH2AX foci as a measure of DNA damage: A computational approach to automatic analysis

Abstract: The γH2AX focus assay represents a fast and sensitive approach for detection of one of the critical types of DNA damage – double-strand breaks (DSB) induced by various cytotoxic agents including ionising radiation. Apart from research applications, the assay has a potential in clinical medicine/pathology, such as assessment of individual radiosensitivity, response to cancer therapies, as well as in biodosimetry. Given that generally there is a direct relationship between numbers of microscopically visualised γ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
90
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(57 reference statements)
4
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6e8, 40,44,45 Recently, we presented several analytical tools for improving the statistical and computational approaches to applying the assay for differential diagnostics in RS and non-RS biodosimetry in tissues and in the primary fibroblast skin culture model. 45,46 Here, we further refine the mathematical criteria of cellular RS. To describe the kinetics of g-H2AX foci decline, we fitted the experimental data (foci counts per nucleus; at 0, 0.5, 2, 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours after irradiation) to an empirical model that assumed the presence of two repair components, slow and fast.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6e8, 40,44,45 Recently, we presented several analytical tools for improving the statistical and computational approaches to applying the assay for differential diagnostics in RS and non-RS biodosimetry in tissues and in the primary fibroblast skin culture model. 45,46 Here, we further refine the mathematical criteria of cellular RS. To describe the kinetics of g-H2AX foci decline, we fitted the experimental data (foci counts per nucleus; at 0, 0.5, 2, 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours after irradiation) to an empirical model that assumed the presence of two repair components, slow and fast.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a 100× objective is required for imaging, which reduces the speed of the instrument, rendering high throughput as low throughput. Therefore, efforts have been made to improve this method, based on microscopy techniques such as imaging modalities in cell culture and in tissues,162 and computer‐assisted approaches 163. The computational approaches are supported by image analysis software such as NIH Image and its Windows counterpart ScionImage, ImageJ, HistoLab, AutoQuantX, or Image Pro, among others, which rely on different computational algorithms for foci identification or the calculation of quantitative foci parameters 164, 165, 166.…”
Section: The γH2ax Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While fluorescence microscope in combination with a digital camera is standard equipment in many laboratories, the availability of specialized software, especially freeware, for the analysis of γ-H2AX foci is increasing (Carpenter, 2006) (Jucha, 2010) (Ivashkevich, 2011). Image analysis implies two distinct steps: selection of the cells and detection of γ-H2AX foci; therefore it needs to load two colour-types of grey scale images: one with counterstained nuclei for cell selection and the other one with fluorescent-coupled anti-γ-H2AX for focus detection.…”
Section: Automation Of Image Analysis: Image Cytometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not compare it to imageJ as a CellProfiler module has been recently created to allow the user to run ImageJ macros and plugins as part of a CellProfiler image processing pipeline (http://cellprofiler.org/CPmanual/RunImageJ.html). In a recent publication, a new image cytometry program that will become freely available was presented (Ivashkevich, 2011). The details on the measurements that will be possible to obtain with this software are not yet disclosed, so we cannot fairly compare it with CellProfiler.…”
Section: Manual Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%