2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00995.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

γH2Ax: Biomarker of Damage or Functional Participant in DNA Repair “All that Glitters Is not Gold!”

Abstract: The phosphorylation of H2Ax on its S139 site, cH2Ax, is important for the assembly of repair complexes at DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). The formation and functional role of cH2Ax after other kinds of DNA damage, especially UV light, where DSBs are rare, is less clear. Following UV light in the UVB and UVC ranges, complex distributions of cH2Ax can be identified, quite unlike the discrete enumerable foci seen after ionizing radiation. Several distinct distributions of cH2Ax occur: a low level nuclear-wide di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
80
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with earlier observations (31,33) immunofluorescence revealed that the cell distribution of γH2AX at each time point was not homogeneous (Fig S3). In a parallel experiment, flow cytometry demonstrated greater heterogeneity of the fluorescent signal in mutant fibroblasts than in control fibroblasts during the 24-h repair period (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agreement with earlier observations (31,33) immunofluorescence revealed that the cell distribution of γH2AX at each time point was not homogeneous (Fig S3). In a parallel experiment, flow cytometry demonstrated greater heterogeneity of the fluorescent signal in mutant fibroblasts than in control fibroblasts during the 24-h repair period (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…DNA damage by UV also induces γH2AX in both proliferating and quiescent cells (31,32), but its relevance to this connection is unclear. Thus, it was proposed that γH2AX might act as a biomarker of UV damage rather than as a participant in repair (33). During NER, the presence of γH2AX signals a persistence of DNA gaps created by excision of the UV-induced damage, and its disappearance signals filling of the gaps by dNTP polymerization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An anti-cH2AX antibody was used to further analyze the DNA damage in infected cells; however, high-background caused by scattered noise and sporadic, undetermined pan-nuclear staining was observed for both infected and control cells, making the foci unable to be quantified in the microscope. This is in agreement with Cleaver (Cleaver, 2011) who showed that cH2AX plays roles in other cellular events and is not a specific marker for DNA damage. However, increased fluorescent signals upon cH2AX staining was clearly visible in infected cells as well as a clear co-localization with the 53BP1-positive foci (Fig.…”
Section: The Expression Of 53bp1 Foci Was Increased During Gonococcalsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…36,37 As expected, transiently transfected PARP1-GFP was concentrated in the nucleoli of WT MEFs under normal conditions and migrated to the nucleoplasm after exposure to H 2 O 2 ( Figures 5a and b) or UV radiation (Figure 5b). Although the DNA damage was comparable in UVirradiated WT and Ulk1-KO MEFs, as suggested by the similar levels of γH2AX (a biomarker of DNA damage) 38 up to 4 h after treatment (Supplementary Figure S4), PARP1-GFP was retained in the nucleoli of Ulk1-KO MEFs exposed to UV radiation or H 2 O 2 (Figures 5a and b). Next, we performed fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments to determine whether PARP1 mobility was altered by ULK1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%