2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

β-Ray brachytherapy with 106Ru plaques for retinoblastoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
32
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] Factors that are relevant to the clinical outcome include the tumor dose coverage and the dose to the organs at risk, such as the optic nerve, the iris, and the fovea. Because this beta radiation produces steep dose gradients, an accurate knowledge of the generated dose distributions is essential for treatment planning and clinical dose assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Factors that are relevant to the clinical outcome include the tumor dose coverage and the dose to the organs at risk, such as the optic nerve, the iris, and the fovea. Because this beta radiation produces steep dose gradients, an accurate knowledge of the generated dose distributions is essential for treatment planning and clinical dose assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As treatment trends shifted, plaques were also used to secondarily treat or to salvage eyes that had failed systemic chemotherapy. Many reports give survival rates for previously treated eyes, and in those in which eyes predominantly received previous chemotherapy, the ocular survival percentages or rates are remarkably similar to those failing EBRT, ranging from 52% to 95% (29-31, 34, 35); this latter figure is from an article that excluded eyes with seeds (29). It appeared that the nature of the previous treatment, whether EBRT or intravenous chemotherapy, had little influence on the success of the brachytherapy-treated eyes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The dose used with Ru-106 plaques in Essen is 80 Gy to the apex, although most tumours responded with a dose of at least 50 Gy. 19 There is no comparative dosimetry of I-125 and Ru-106 and there appears to be a disparity in the doses used. They cannot simply be transposed from one isotope to the other.…”
Section: Intraocular Tumoursmentioning
confidence: 99%