2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

β -particle energy-summing correction for β -delayed proton emission measurements

Abstract: A common approach to studying β-delayed proton emission is to measure the energy of the emitted proton and corresponding nuclear recoil in a double-sided silicon-strip detector (DSSD) after implanting the β-delayed protonemitting (βp) nucleus. However, in order to extract the proton-decay energy, the measured energy must be corrected for the additional energy implanted in the DSSD by the β-particle emitted from the βp nucleus, an effect referred to here as β-summing. We present an approach to determine an accu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(86 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These negligible differences associated with variations on nuclides can be understood by considering the remarkably similar implantation distributions shown in Fig. 1, as well as the fact that β summing on proton energy has been demonstrated to be relatively insensitive to the β-decay Q values [73].…”
Section: A Proton Energy and Efficiency Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These negligible differences associated with variations on nuclides can be understood by considering the remarkably similar implantation distributions shown in Fig. 1, as well as the fact that β summing on proton energy has been demonstrated to be relatively insensitive to the β-decay Q values [73].…”
Section: A Proton Energy and Efficiency Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These negligible differences associated with variations on nuclides can be understood by considering the remarkably similar implantation distributions shown in Fig. 4, as well as the fact that β summing on proton energy has been demonstrated to be relatively insensitive to the β-decay Q values [75]. For both 25 Si and 27 S, the decay energy measured by the DSSD is a combination of the proton energy, the recoil energy of the heavy ion induced by the emitted proton, and the energy loss of the β particle deposited in the detector.…”
Section: B Proton Energy and Efficiency Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, we apply Occam's razor and report values obtained with the simpler doublet model which provides a well-constrained energy for the lowest-energy peak in the β-delayed proton spectrum of 73 Sr. From this analysis the resulting proton separation energy of 73 Rb using the doublet model, after applying a β-summing correction (110 ± 15 keV) found from GEANT4 simulations of the detector setup [31] as well as LISE++ simulations of the implant depth distribution and accounting for the defect in measuring the recoil nucleus' energy [23], is determined to be S(p) = −640 (40) keV. Since the posterior probability for the low energy peak approximately reduced to a Gaussian, the error reported is 1σ of an approximate Gaussian added in quadrature with the β-summing uncertainty.…”
Section: A Proton Separation Energy Of 73 Rbmentioning
confidence: 99%