2012
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01525-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

β-Lactams Increase the Antibacterial Activity of Daptomycin against Clinical Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains and Prevent Selection of Daptomycin-Resistant Derivatives

Abstract: Methicillin-resistant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
88
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
8
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all strains, the DAP MIC was lowered in the presence of all of the ␤-lactam antibiotics tested. The DAP MIC for DNS MRSA was decreased to the susceptible range, consistent with prior data (23). The high fC avg s of some ␤-lactam antibiotics alone (piperacillin-tazobactam [TZP], cefepime [FEP], MEM, and CTX) inhibited the growth of certain strains, and therefore, DAP enhancement could not be evaluated.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For all strains, the DAP MIC was lowered in the presence of all of the ␤-lactam antibiotics tested. The DAP MIC for DNS MRSA was decreased to the susceptible range, consistent with prior data (23). The high fC avg s of some ␤-lactam antibiotics alone (piperacillin-tazobactam [TZP], cefepime [FEP], MEM, and CTX) inhibited the growth of certain strains, and therefore, DAP enhancement could not be evaluated.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Many bioactive compounds produced by Streptomyces spp., for example phenolic compounds and antibiotics, have been shown to alter cell surface appearance. Previous observations include wrinkling of the cell surface and cell shrinkage [22,24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously observed that DAP-mediated sensitization to ␤-lactams occurred with those ␤-lactams that preferentially target PBP 1 or PBP 2, including NAF (PBP 1, PBP 2), IPM (PBP 1), and CTX (PBP 2), whereas no changes were observed with ␤-lactams targeting PBP 4, such as cefoxitin (FOX), or PBP 3, such as cefaclor (CEC) (8,21,22). Similar effects were observed in other in vitro-selected DAP r mutants obtained from DAP s CB1631 (DAP r CB1631 mutants) and CB5011 (DAP r CB5011 mutants) (8). Collectively, these observations suggest that the seesaw effect involves CW modifications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, we reported that two DAP r strains, CB5036 and CB5014, with mutations in the central domain of MprF, P314L and S377L, respectively, did not display the DAP-mediated seesaw effect; i.e., their OXA MICs remained the same (512 g/ml) in both strains of pairs of DAP s -DAP r strains (strains CB5035 (8). However, as we described previously, the DAP-OXA combination was still effective against them (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation