Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-2728(05)80125-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

β-Carotene within the isolated Photosystem II reaction centre: photooxidation and irreversible bleaching of this chromophore by oxidised P680

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
110
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
110
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, those in PS II were reported to be oxidized under photoinhibitory conditions (ref. [7] and this study). This seems to be a unique feature of PS II.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, those in PS II were reported to be oxidized under photoinhibitory conditions (ref. [7] and this study). This seems to be a unique feature of PS II.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Photobleaching of carotenoids has been observed previously as one of the phenomenon diagnostic of photoinhibi- tic,n in chloroplasts [5] or PS II membranes [6] after removal of the Mn cluster, or in isolated reaction centers [7]. In this stlldy, illumination of a mutant lacking Yz in the Dl polypeptide was also shown to be accompanied by irreversible photobleaching of carotenoid(s) upon illumination.…”
Section: Photobleaching Of Carotenoidsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…At 20°C, this 'red peak' is normally at 675.5-676 nm (Chapman et al, 1989). However, during illumination of the isolated reaction centres, this peak shifts to below 673 nm due to damage of the chlorophylls comprising the primary electron-donor P680 (Telfer et al, 1991). The 'red peak' of the preparation isolated from photoinhibited leaves is at 676 nm, indicating that the chromophores making up the special pair in the latge majority of centres are undamaged by photoinhibitory treatment of the leaves (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Donor-side inhibition is thought to result from the accumulation of P680+, which is a highly oxidising species (Thompson and Brudvig, 1988). This species can extract electrons from its surroundings and has been shown to cause irreversible bleaching of the accessory pigment molecules in the reaction-centre complex (Telfer et al, 1991(Telfer et al, , 1992. P680' can also remove electrons from its protein environment as evidenced by the oxidation of Tyrl61 residues on the D1 and D2 proteins (Debus et al, 1988;Vermaas et al, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both experimental systems the appearance of the C-terminal-containing fragment requires the presence of an electron acceptor so as to allow long-lived oxidised species to accumulate on the donor side of the reaction centre [9]. It is therefore proposed that in some way, possjbly by destruction of secondary pigments [26,27], these species trigger the proteolpic hjrdrolysis of a peptide bond in the polypeptide loop spanning transmembrane segments I and II at the lumenal side of the thylakoid membrane [l&28]. In so doing fragments of about 24 kDa and IO kDa are generated, where the former contains the C-terminus and the latter the Nterminus of the Dl -protein.…”
Section: Discussion If It Contains the C-terminus Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%