2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

α/β ratio: A dose range dependence study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with previous work that if indeed the DE is lower than previously thought then increasing the dose/fraction would be radiobiologically advantageous 20 . It confirms that if DE is really lower than expected, better tumour control should be achieved by fewer fractions but a larger dose/fraction 14,16,33 . To test this further four different published hypo-fractionation trials (listed in table 3) for prostate cancer were investigated.…”
Section: Tcp As a Function Of Dementioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This agrees with previous work that if indeed the DE is lower than previously thought then increasing the dose/fraction would be radiobiologically advantageous 20 . It confirms that if DE is really lower than expected, better tumour control should be achieved by fewer fractions but a larger dose/fraction 14,16,33 . To test this further four different published hypo-fractionation trials (listed in table 3) for prostate cancer were investigated.…”
Section: Tcp As a Function Of Dementioning
confidence: 54%
“…There is an increasing body of evidence that prostate cancer cells behave as a late reacting tissue and therefore the DE value for prostate cancer cells could have a value as low as 1 to as high as 5 [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] . This is in sharp contrast to the accepted value of 10 for most tumours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus vascular damage and immunological effects may increase the antitumoural efficacy of large doses [7][9]. On the other hand, the surviving fraction of cells after high doses may be higher than predicted by the continuously downward bending curve described by the linear-quadratic (L-Q) model for cell inactivation [10]. Indeed, the dose range for which this model can be used is a matter of debate [8], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted a custom literature search in order to collect measured or calculated α, β and α/β ratios for different cell types and organs versus energy [103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113]. The goals was to link differences of SER and RBE values versus energy, and explain discrepancies between the calculated and simulated DERs and the measured RBE and SER of different cell lines.…”
Section: I4f Der Vs Rbe and Sermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goals was to link differences of SER and RBE values versus energy, and explain discrepancies between the calculated and simulated DERs and the measured RBE and SER of different cell lines. Energy ranges varied from low dose rate brachytherapy sources (I-125 and Pb-103) [104,110,112], high dose rate brachytherapy sources (Ir-192) [108], 250 kVp x-ray sources [103,113], external MV beams [105 -107, 109, 111, 112]. All these studies used different cell lines, organs and tissues both from humans and animals.…”
Section: I4f Der Vs Rbe and Sermentioning
confidence: 99%