2013
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.248591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

α1A‐Adrenergic regulation of inhibition in the olfactory bulb

Abstract: Key points• Here, in mouse brain slices, we examined the cellular effects of noradrenaline to better understand its influence on olfactory bulb processing.• β-and α 1 -adrenergic receptor activation increases GABA currents in mitral cells in an age-dependent manner; the β-adrenergic effect is prominent only during early postnatal weeks, while the α 1 effect is present at all ages.• This study focused on the α 1 -mediated increase in GABA inhibitory currents in mitral cells and found noradrenaline acts on the α… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(89 reference statements)
5
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are generally consistent with experimental data drawn from rats (Nai et al 2010), in which neither ADPs nor persistent firing were reported under NE modulation. However, interestingly, in analogous studies performed in mouse OB slices, a submaximal concentration of NE application (10.0 M) did produce a slow ADP (in addition to direct membrane depolarization) that could lead to quasipersistent firing, even when starting from more hyperpolarized resting membrane potentials than evoke ADPs under CCh modulation (i.e., Ϫ60 mV; Zimnik et al 2013).…”
Section: Effects Of Cch and Ne Modulation On Current-evoked Gc Responmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These results are generally consistent with experimental data drawn from rats (Nai et al 2010), in which neither ADPs nor persistent firing were reported under NE modulation. However, interestingly, in analogous studies performed in mouse OB slices, a submaximal concentration of NE application (10.0 M) did produce a slow ADP (in addition to direct membrane depolarization) that could lead to quasipersistent firing, even when starting from more hyperpolarized resting membrane potentials than evoke ADPs under CCh modulation (i.e., Ϫ60 mV; Zimnik et al 2013).…”
Section: Effects Of Cch and Ne Modulation On Current-evoked Gc Responmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Specifically, our base model expresses strong frequency adaptation and large AHPs, replicating experimental data drawn from rat main OB slices (Nai et al 2010;Pressler et al 2007) and evincing relatively large I M and I AHP conductances. In contrast, the mouse main OB GCs studied by Zimnik et al (2013) exhibit much smaller AHP responses (1 mV AHP from a 500-ms depolarization; Figs. 1C and 3A from Zimnik et al 2013), indicating that they express far smaller I M and I AHP conductances.…”
Section: Effects Of Cch and Ne Modulation On Current-evoked Gc Responmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations